Ok, I'm convinced. It's nice knowing that in our old age, we'll be the beneficiaries of a society full of the finest students history has ever produced, created by the similarly finest education system.The average college student needs to know a lot of other shit not on that test, not just to succeed in school, but also to exist in modern society.
They did not need to spend a bunch of time learning how to drive a car, operate a computer, etc. They also didn't need to learn about the past century's vast scientific advancements. People in 1900 still thought flies spawned from leftover meat.
People dramatically underestimate the cognitive overhead of modern life, or how much new knowledge has been created every year over the past century, and how much it continues to accelerate. Also underestimated is the amount of noise we're bombarded with daily. That the average college student is probably a bit worse at doing advanced trigonometry by hand is a small cost.
The ability of certain people to claim that the internet, where racist shitposts and top secret classified information can be found on side by side within throwing distance of any given cat picture, as some kind of totalitarian censorship state, will never cease to amaze me.Ftfy
If everything was so broken and everyone was so dumb, why do previously unimaginable, world-altering advancements keep coming out every few years?Ok, I'm convinced. It's nice knowing that in our old age, we'll be the beneficiaries of a society full of the finest students history has ever produced, created by the similarly finest education system.
Damn, 2024 is looking up already!
Well, first:If everything was so broken and everyone was so dumb, why do previously unimaginable, world-altering advancements keep coming out every few years?
World-altering advancements aren't coming from average people. The best of the best will succeed despite their environment having turned to shit, and those that also have the best of the best environments, obviously more so.I don't think anyone would argue that the smartest students aren't smarter now.
I definitely didn't say that. Nowhere will you find that in what I said. You appear to have a reading comprehension problem, what was your SAT score for verbal?And second, you say that as if it's impossible that things ever backslide.
So you use scientific progress up to this point as evidence that people aren't dumb and things aren't broken. And ok, so you apparently think that backsliding is possible, but you're here arguing that people are smarter now than in the past (is this solely in reference to now versus 1900? or do you think it's been a relatively steady advancement over time?). And also that education doesn't matter, so no point in worrying about it falling apart? Yeah, I feel like my point about the wheels coming off still stands, but feel free to show me on the doll where my lack of comprehension touched you.I definitely didn't say that. Nowhere will you find that in what I said. You appear to have a reading comprehension problem, what was your SAT score for verbal?
Anyway, secondary and post-secondary education contributes very little to general intelligence, and therefore the ability to solve general problems given the tools generally available. As long as young kids have access to books and other reading resources during critical periods of development, they will reach something close to their maximum potential general intelligence. Which for most people is pretty average; that's how Bell curves work. People with high general intelligence generally outperform average people in life, regardless of educational attainment. Intelligence tends to find its level.
Nope, I didn't argue this either.but you're here arguing that people are smarter now than in the past
If everything was so broken and everyone was so dumb, why do previously unimaginable, world-altering advancements keep coming out every few years?
Low IQ take. The smartphone is the most democratized technology the world has ever seen. Practically every adult on the planet has one, and they're all roughly just about as good as the other, IE a $1400 iphone is not that much better than a $200 Motorola. They both run basically the same apps and browse the same web. One has fancier photos. For some people, a smartphone costs quite a lot larger share of their annual income to buy, but they buy them anyway because they're so valuable to their lives.Can you give ten examples?
The only recent and accessible advancement I can think of is Chat-GPT, which is easily distributed bc software. Everything else is bottle-necked to the rich or heavily-subsidized.
Good to see your Gold status hasn't changed you. Still a doucheThe ability of certain people to claim that the internet, where racist shitposts and top secret classified information can be found on side by side within throwing distance of any given cat picture, as some kind of totalitarian censorship state, will never cease to amaze me.
"I've been deplatformed!" he types to thousands of followers from a device that would have been unimaginable 20 years ago.
I'm trying to give my posts a more aristocratic air if you couldn't tell.Good to see your Gold status hasn't changed you. Still a douche
I'm trying to give my posts a more aristocratic air if you couldn't tell.
He's getting crazier by the week. Fat lonely tranny with no friends, works at Wal Mart. Rivals Foler for making shit up, pretends to have a high IQ, but like being a woman is merely illusory.Good to see your Gold status hasn't changed you. Still a douche
I think you described Scuba Steve too.He's getting crazier by the week. Fat lonely tranny with no friends, works at Wal Mart. Rivals Foler for making shit up, pretends to have a high IQ, but like being a woman is merely illusory.
Low IQ take. The smartphone is the most democratized technology the world has ever seen. Practically every adult on the planet has one, and they're all roughly just about as good as the other, IE a $1400 iphone is not that much better than a $200 Motorola. They both run basically the same apps and browse the same web. One has fancier photos. For some people, a smartphone costs quite a lot larger share of their annual income to buy, but they buy them anyway because they're so valuable to their lives.
Also, cars. It used to be only fancy cars had backup cameras and other safety sensors. Now even >35K cars have all the latest features and device integrations. A >25k car has many features that only luxury cars had 15 years ago.
That fast food is your example is very telling. Fast food is not an innovation, it's literally the worst thing you can spend your dollars on. It is true that a few of the major chains have taken a huge hit in quality and value per dollar. How about not eating there?
Your complaint seems to be that people working the lowest wage jobs appear to be very dumb. Again, this is how Bell curves work, this is not a fixable problem. No amount of education brings up the bottom of the curve. Every generation has complained that the people doing low wage jobs are dumb.
Not gonna write a thesis with a bibliography to respond to a low effort, low IQ shitpost.So he asks for 10 and you can only do 2 and you talk about reading comprehension problems?! Never change Mist.
Low IQ take. The smartphone is the most democratized technology the world has ever seen. Practically every adult on the planet has one, and they're all roughly just about as good as the other, IE a $1400 iphone is not that much better than a $200 Motorola. They both run basically the same apps and browse the same web. One has fancier photos. For some people, a smartphone costs quite a lot larger share of their annual income to buy, but they buy them anyway because they're so valuable to their lives.
Also, cars. It used to be only fancy cars had backup cameras and other safety sensors. Now even >35K cars have all the latest features and device integrations. A >25k car has many features that only luxury cars had 15 years ago.
That fast food is your example is very telling. Fast food is not an innovation, it's literally the worst thing you can spend your dollars on. It is true that a few of the major chains have taken a huge hit in quality and value per dollar. How about not eating there?
Your complaint seems to be that people working the lowest wage jobs appear to be very dumb. Again, this is how Bell curves work, this is not a fixable problem. No amount of education brings up the bottom of the curve. Every generation has complained that the people doing low wage jobs are dumb.
Not gonna write a thesis with a bibliography to respond to a low effort, low IQ shitpost.
What? Where?You're going back over 100 years to answer my question, lmao.
If they were competent, they would not have the lowest paying jobs.The lowest paying jobs in America have not always been filled with incompetent people.