Good points. I guess I remember the UTRs and butthurt juries more than the deserving players, maybe because I focus on the injustice. I still hate Boston Rob though.The first time she won the game the alternative was far, far worse (Lil...trust me, Sandra winning that was a good thing. Fairplay was the best player, but he didn't make it to the end).
I broke down the winners on one of the FoH threads, and it was easy to see that, as a whole, deserving players do end up winning more than under the radar players:
Hatch, Ethan, Heidik (not only uber strategic, but also an uber asshole), Chris, Tom, Aras, Yul, Earl, Todd, Parvati, Bob, Boston Rob, Kim. That's 13 winners who were the dominant strategic force (or at least a big part of it) on their season and completely deserving. I left out several other deserving players who weren't big on strategy (JT, Tina, Dani, Vecepia).
My point is that there have been very few under the radar players who have won, and fewer undeserving winners. Under the Radar will get you far in Survivor, maybe even to the end, but it won't likely win you the game. Butthurt juries happen, and deserving players have gotten screwed out of the million, but these situations are in the minority.
Edit: Yeah, you can throw JT in the strategic column too, but it's generally seen as Stephen controlling the brains part of that season.
Erm what? They got married, of course he was entitled to spend her winnings.I remember at the time that Amber won, I felt that the show should have made it clear that those two cannot share the million bucks. And frankly, I think they should have disclosed outside auditing of their financials to prove that Boston Rob never got a dime of his wife's money to spend or they should take the money back
EDIT - Oh and I thought it was bullshit what he pulled on Lex. I really liked Lex and Lex made dumbest move of his game trusting Boston Rob. I couldn't believe the luck that they pulled buffs to swap teams and both teams stayed the same minus Amber leaving Rob, couldn't have scripted it any better to F over Rob and Amber. He was smart to promise Lex, but I wish he would have been a bit more honorable and kept his promise to Lex.
There is no colluding to split the winnings. Getting married later is collusion and you are now splitting the winnings. Survivor law > US lawErm what? They got married, of course he was entitled to spend her winnings.
I've noticed Jeff has gotten a little more... blunt in recent seasons ("Sherri is completely useless in this challenge!"), but the guy has proven time and time again that he really knows how to get out of people what he wants. I'm always glad when I read that he re-upped his contract, because there's no way they could find a host that would be able to fill his shoes.Definitely give props to Jeff for playing an outstanding retard whisperer. If I'm ever being attacked by an insane midget, there is no one I would rather have nearby than Jeff Probst.
I'd also speculate that a lot of the questions that seem especially pressing are shown out of context and in response to something someone else said.I've had that thought as well. You have to remember that tribal council is a lot longer than what we see. We get the edited parts and I'm sure they show the clips that are more about showing that person's hand but I imagine he spreads those questions around to not put the focus on a particular person or issue.
I think that was a decision Probst made himself. I read an interview once where he said he really hated doing them and felt they were extremely cheesy.Is anyone else a little sad that Jeff doesn't do any cool entrances into the finale anymore?
The time where he took the votes then drove the Jet Ski across the ocean was the greatest reality television moment ever
Sometimes, yes, which makes me wonder if Probst has really changed that much or the editing has changed so more of Probst's pressing questions are asked. My guess would be it's a little of both. I seem to recall them changing their director (or whatever that role is for a reality show) a few seasons back, but at the same time, I would suspect that as more people come on the show that have watched previous seasons (which obviously isn't always the case), they come to realize more and more that it's not always in your best interest to answer Probst's questions. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that it's become a little harder to draw people out, which has led to him asking more direct questions.For all we know these things had already come up during the TC. Don't those things last for a couple hours?