Tanoomba's Toxic Tank of Traducement

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Status
Not open for further replies.
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
Tanoomba said:
Take a deep breath, organize your thoughts, and make a point. Knowing Zoe Quinn doesn't make Sarkeesian harmful. You haven't even explained how blocking Tweets is harmful,
Click to expand...


you're the biggest retard on the forumns retard, crash overide network works for twitter censoring twitter, anita is an intersecional feminist you're literally to retarded to listen to anita explain what she is to you.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
1: "anita has outsized influence compared to normal person"
2: "how"
1: "through her feminist connections she wormed into tech companies xyz and the united natios, helping her longtime pal become a twitter thought polize
2: "well I don't see why we're bring connections and influence into a discussion about connections and influence"
1: /facepalm
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin said:
you're the biggest retard on the forumns retard, crash overide network works for twitter censoring twitter, anita is an intersecional feminist you're literally to retarded to listen to anita explain what she is to you.
Click to expand...

Relax.

No, seriously. We're just having a discussion here. There is zero reason to start frothing at the mouth and pounding at your keyboard like a rabid monkey. Deep breaths, Fana.

Here are some things you apparently don't understand:

- Censorship isn't in and of itself a bad thing. It absolutely CAN be, but there isn't anything inherently wrong with tailoring content to suit an audience.
- Nobody has a right to harass and abuse people over Twitter. Attempting to curb asshole behavior is not by default "destructive".
- People who have been specifically targeted with heavy amounts of harassment and online abuse are obviously more likely to try to take a stand against it. Those who have observed this harassment in real time are likely to support them. There is nothing surprising or wrong with this.
- Twitter, despite its popularity, is not the voice of the internet. ANY point of view, whether or not it can be expressed on Twitter, has a voice on the internet. Proof: Google, Twitter, and the mainstream media working together couldn't keep Trump supporters from being heard and ultimately deciding the election.

I'd like for you to explain to me what you think intersectional feminism is and what about it is inherently harmful. So far you've shown that you're fantastic at hand-wringing and sign-waving, but you have made zero effort to back up literally any of the things you've claimed. It seems that years of preaching to the choir may have made you lazy. The fact that you can shit on SJWs here and get some easy likes does not mean that what you claim is self-evident.

Don't forget: Deep breaths.
 
  • 1Bullshit
Reactions: 1 user
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin said:
1: "anita has outsized influence compared to normal person"
2: "how"
1: "through her feminist connections she wormed into tech companies xyz and the united natios, helping her longtime pal become a twitter thought polize
2: "well I don't see why we're bring connections and influence into a discussion about connections and influence"
1: /facepalm
Click to expand...

"Influence" DOES NOT EQUAL "harm". Watch your goal posts, Fana, they're all over the place.
 
  • 1Bullshit
Reactions: 1 user
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Adebisi said:
So I'm listening to an old FemFreq video review, because I want to hear Sarky backpedal her bullshit in light of "Trump vs Video Games". Lordy lord, it's as hilariously retarded as it was years ago.

I enjoyed her use of the term "non-player sex object" when referring to female NPCs that are strippers or hookers in sandbox games. Why didn't she also talk about Non-Player Taxi Objects ... I can kill those guys and take their cars, then pick up their fares! Or what about Non-Player Hot Dog Cart Owner Objects? Non-Player Firefighter Objects?

Gotta focus on those wymmin doing the sex! I could also rob business women in GTA, you know.
Click to expand...
These are not difficult questions, but then again you weren't really asking, were you?
 
  • 1Bullshit
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
Tanoomba said:
"Influence" DOES NOT EQUAL "harm". Watch your goal posts, Fana, they're all over the place.
Click to expand...

the harm is the feminist ideology based on critical theory you fucking mongloid, all we were doing was establishing influence which you tried to brush off COMPLETELY.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
fanaskin said:
As a single individual? she actually has done outsized harm far beyond any average person, as a representative of an ideology the ideology itself is harm, that's what it wants to accomplish deconstruction and demolition, that's what they TELL YOU they want to do ffs.
Click to expand...
Tanoomba said:
"Influence" DOES NOT EQUAL "harm". Watch your goal posts, Fana, they're all over the place.
Click to expand...

You're literally too stupid to argue with, bye.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin said:
the harm is the feminist ideology based on critical theory you fucking mongloid, all we were doing was establishing influence which you tried to brush off COMPLETELY.
Click to expand...

"Anita is booble gooble goo!"

"OK, why is that bad?"

"It's bad because booble gooble goo!"

"What does that mean?"

"It means booble gooble goo! Idiot! You're a real retard! Stupid! Mongoloid! Ummm... Moron!"

You think the talking points you're spouting are self-evident. They're not. You have yet to make a single actual point.

Does Sarkeesian have influence? Yes, she does. Is that, in and of itself, bad? No, of course not. So why is it harmful in this case? Darned if I know, you've provided nothing.

Is Sarkeesian a feminist? Yes, she is. Is that, in and of itself, bad? No, of course not. So what makes it harmful in this case? Darned if I know, you've provided nothing.

Is Sarkeesian friends with Zoe Quinn? Yes, she is. Did she use her influence to help Quinn establish an anti-harassment organization? Yes, she did. Is that, in and of itself, bad? No, of course not. So why is it harmful in this case? Darned if I know, you've provided nothing.

Your statements are not self-evident, Fana. The circle jerk is happy to agree with your conclusions because they don't give a shit if they're justified. This has apparently given you the confidence to think you can handle an actual discussion with someone who isn't in your bubble. I don't take your silly, over-the-top claims at face value, Fana. You're actually going to have to get off your ass and make an actual point at some point.
 
  • 1Bullshit
Reactions: 1 user
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin said:
Must be nice to ignore the what everyone tells you constantly and come back everyday anew like a Alzheimer patient. I think you've been told many times exactly how stupid your thinking is.
Click to expand...

Forgot this one.

So then you think that Trump is a sexist, racist, xenophobic, ignorant, lying con man? After all, that's what "everyone" says about him constantly. If "It's been said many times" is your litmus test to verify truth, there are a LOT of unfortunate things you're going to be disappointed to learn are "true".
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
Tanoomba said:
"Anita is booble gooble goo!"

"OK, why is that bad?"

"It's bad because booble gooble goo!"

"What does that mean?"

"It means booble gooble goo! Idiot! You're a real retard! Stupid! Mongoloid! Ummm... Moron!"

You think the talking points you're spouting are self-evident. They're not. You have yet to make a single actual point.

Does Sarkeesian have influence? Yes, she does. Is that, in and of itself, bad? No, of course not. So why is it harmful in this case? Darned if I know, you've provided nothing.

Is Sarkeesian a feminist? Yes, she is. Is that, in and of itself, bad? No, of course not. So what makes it harmful in this case? Darned if I know, you've provided nothing.

Is Sarkeesian friends with Zoe Quinn? Yes, she is. Did she use her influence to help Quinn establish an anti-harassment organization? Yes, she did. Is that, in and of itself, bad? No, of course not. So why is it harmful in this case? Darned if I know, you've provided nothing.

Your statements are not self-evident, Fana. The circle jerk is happy to agree with your conclusions because they don't give a shit if they're justified. This has apparently given you the confidence to think you can handle an actual discussion with someone who isn't in your bubble. I don't take your silly, over-the-top claims at face value, Fana. You're actually going to have to get off your ass and make an actual point at some point.
Click to expand...


Here's a lefty professor explaining succinctly why post modernism which Anita pushes is a poison to the world.

p.s. he doesn't resort to looking like a fool using turkey noises in his argument.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin said:
Here's a lefty professor explaining succinctly why post modernism which Anita pushes is a poison to the world.

p.s. he doesn't resort to looking like a fool using turkey noises in his argument.
Click to expand...

Can you quote Sarkeesian pushing post-modernism? Again, your claim that this is the case is not self-evident.
 
Lightning Lord Rule

Il_Duce Lightning Lord Rule

Lightning Fast
<Charitable Administrator>
11,118
59,412
Every time I come in to check on this thread, I rest easy and secure in the knowledge that I've done the right thing
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
Tanoomba literally hasn't absorbed any of the stuff we've been talking about on this board.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin said:
You're literally too stupid to argue with, bye.
Click to expand...
So you're going to pretend you didn't change your stance from "she actually has done outsized harm far beyond any average person" (a grandiose statement packed with hyperbole that would be practically impossible to prove) to "anita has outsized influence compared to normal person" (which is a statement no one would disagree with but implies no "harm" at all)?

(I had the "Well... Bye" video queued up but I guess you're not leaving after all.)
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
Tanoomba said:
I don't absorb bullshit, I step around it.
Click to expand...

you literally miss basic facts and history and stuff, you're like an alzheimers patient everytime I converse with you, nothing learned, nothing remembered.
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,069
138,991
Tanoomba said:
So you're going to pretend you didn't change your stance from "she actually has done outsized harm far beyond any average person" (a grandiose statement packed with hyperbole that would be practically impossible to prove) to "anita has outsized influence compared to normal person" (which is a statement no one would disagree with but implies no "harm" at all)?
Click to expand...

You has outsized influence peddling harmful ideology, why do you make this so complicated when it's rather simple?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.