fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
Tanoomba's Toxic Tank of Traducement
- Thread starter Lightning Lord Rule
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
- Status
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Yeah, I've heard this before. And yet, if I ask you to name ONE SINGLE FACT I've missed you won't be able to do it, because it's a lie and all you're apparently capable of is spouting hollow rhetoric and not backing up a single thing you say.
Make a statement, BACK IT UP. That's the definition of simplicity, and yet you are incapable of grasping this concept. WHAT "harmful ideology" is Sarkeesian peddling? WHY is it harmful? HOW is she pushing post-modernism? If she actually does these things, these are easy questions to answer and yet you flounder and flop, you duck and dodge, you go off on tangent after tangent and go well out of your way to avoid supporting anything you say.
NONE of your statements are self-evident, and you have made ZERO effort to support a single thing you've said. Your entire argument begins and ends with "She's a villain". Have you seriously never had a discussion with someone who disagreed with you before? Have you never been asked to back up a claim before?
Kiroy
Marine Biologist
- 35,522
- 102,787
He is the foh version of the incredible hulk. Any logic and common sense aimed towards him only acts to make him more retarded.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
inter sectional post modern critical theory style feminism, are you like literally brain damaged?
- 1
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
sarkeesian critical theory - Google Search
See critical theory, anita is using critical theory, this IS post modernism, THIS IS intersectionality, you ARE retarded.
See critical theory, anita is using critical theory, this IS post modernism, THIS IS intersectionality, you ARE retarded.
- 1
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
Actually I don't blame tanoomba that much because they themselves have loose definitions for their made up shit and are somewhat vague, it's baked into the cake of their bullshit, as noam chomsky describes aptly here.
They created their own academic echo chamber that's also purposefully somewhat vague (they don't use cross disciplinary critique much or at all, have no use for biology ect)
They created their own academic echo chamber that's also purposefully somewhat vague (they don't use cross disciplinary critique much or at all, have no use for biology ect)
- 1
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
In what world do you live in where this is an explanation of ANYTHING?
By the way, if all you're going to do is throw buzz words at me, then you sure as hell had better not start accusing ME of resorting to semantics arguments. You literally threw a pile of words at me that didn't even form a sentence, much less a coherent thought. All I can do is look at what these words mean.
What's the problem? No, seriously: WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
Listen, Fana. You're tossing around a bunch of labels here, some of which may not even apply (see: post-modernist), and NONE of which are de facto associated with causing harm. At least when the anti-Trump crowd use labels in lieu of actual arguments, THEY USE PEJORATIVE LABELS. You basically went from "She's a villain" to "She's a villain because (string of labels that in no way imply villainy)". FFS, Fana, the law of averages says that by now you should have actually addressed, if even by accident, something she actually said at some point, but you've gone very much out of your way to avoid mentioning her actual views at all. You have put a LOT of effort into being exceptionally lazy.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
Those are their buzzwords lawl, are you literally denying the existence of these idea's though? it's literally everywhere, the ideology is in the mainstream, FFS anita was saying "YAY IT"S AT THE OSCARS YAY"
AND YOU STILL DENY IT EXISTS.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
Those are the labels they use themselves you fucking moron of the highest order, i'm not boxing them in.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
Their shit isn't very coherent I agree, that's why it's so lulzy to expose the illogic of the stupid shit they believe, and why like the retard you are you get shit on trying to defend it.
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,575
- 15,890
Uh, I don't think he denies their existence. But reeling off a bunch of words is not an argument. Maybe you feel it's been argued with him elsewhere or it's self evident that all those things are bad, but that's still not an argument you're actually making.
- 1
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
What? I didn't deny they exist. I provided definitions for every single one, FFS. Clearly I am capable of acknowledging them. What I denied was that these labels describe beliefs that are inherently harmful. You are under the false assumption that labels = arguments. They don't.
Right. Again, I ask: WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
You didn't expose ANY "illogic" at all, dude. You haven't said a single word about what "they" believe, and I haven't said a single word defending it. You must be having an entirely different conversation in your head because you clearly have no idea what's going on here.
No, Noam wasn't talking about them specifically. It's up to YOU to show that what he describes applies to them, and that they are causing harm. Again (again), IT IS NOT A GIVEN.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
what did noam chomsky say the problem was, that's the sofest critique you'll find too.
show me you absorbed anything I presented to you.
- 1
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
it is a given, just like at this point it's a given you're retarded, he was talking about post modern intersectional feminism, anita is a post modern intersectional feminist, every critique about how they operate in university is viewable in anita's schooling experience and things like her thesis ect ( notice feminism has no biological component )
that's insane that a discipline that anita payed money for that claims it's about women HAS NO BIOLOGY COMPONENT, that alone should make it illegitimate
- 1
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 56,069
- 138,989
the feminism anita practices causes real world harm because it deny's biology and science at a visceral level, it's also mostly bourgouise petty gripes that have the effect in the third world of crushing real change by in practice taking up too much oxygen substituting pressing and dire gripes for weak and imaginary ones.
- 1
- Status