I don't think they're going to be able to make a full scale version of this technology.
...or maybe a giant treadmill?The concept is hilarious so I did some napkin math. If you have a launcher with a 50-foot radius, in order to achieve escape velocity of 11.2 km/s (ignoring air resistance) your payload is going to experience centripital acceleration of about 840,000 G's. A solid metal payload would be a pancake even if we had a device capable of generating/resisting such forces, which we don't. In order to limit the centripital acceleration to 10 G's you'd need a launcher the radius of the continental United States.
Maybe there's some hybrid version where you catapult an actual rocket at the limit of its structural integrity and it goes the rest of the way up under thrust. I think there are good reasons we're not already doing this, though.
That level of G force wont be a problem for electronics, thats comparable or less than what artillery shells experience on firing and theyre filled various electronics.Edit: On a closer watch, they are going for a hybrid approach with a 2 km/s release speed and 50-meter radius. That's still 8200 G's. I also can't wait to see the timing failures when your 7200 km/hr fuel-laden rocket hits the sides of your launch facility.
That level of G force wont be a problem for electronics, thats comparable or less than what artillery shells experience on firing and theyre filled various electronics.
Yeah that's one of the red flags about this concept, it would never launch a currently designed satellite but they don't tell you that.There are electronics in artillery shells but I wouldn't say it's not a problem for them. The G forces are probably the primary design consideration and there are a LOT of downsides to it.
You don't know what you're talking about.You guys are idiots.
Cell phones take 1000s of gs without breaking the screen.
Much less the actual electronics
Properly mounted electronics should be fine
You don't know what you're talking about.
Mending fences and voting Hillary make you a physicist?
How many g's does a phone experience going from 4ft to the ground, on concrete or tile? I've dropped several phones like that without even breaking the screen.
Since BrutulTM prolly can't do the math, if someone wants do the math...
You probably didn't know this, but before I came back to the ranch I spent 10 years designing telemetry systems for bombs and missiles. I never personally did one for an artillery shell but I know people who did and dealing with the acceleration was a nightmare and dictated the entire design. Also I would rather be branded than vote for Hillary.
I'm not saying it's impossible, I was just correcting you for saying that those sort of g's would be no problem for "properly mounted" electronics or that your cell phone would be fine being fired from a gun.
whatever payloads they are going to send on that thing surviving the initial acceleration is going to have to be a major design consideration.