FTFYThen we wait 6 months for them to say something is broken!
324 points of failure and NASA estimates it has a 80% chance of success. You may well get your wish.
Might have to wait longer than that. The telescope only has the ability to view a small portion of the sky at any given time as the entire spacecraft most rotate to point he mirror but that is heavily constrained by the limits of the sunshield blocking sunlight. Scott Manley has a good video on one of the big limitations of the telescope;Then we wait 6 months for our minds to be blown!
I imagine a bunch of atheist at NASA and whoever made that found god and are praying like hell it makes it to its orbit and unfolds correctly.
Also a great example of what happens when you have a garbage space program. Have to design literal rube goldberg machines to fit inside small launchers.
Might have to wait longer than that. The telescope only has the ability to view a small portion of the sky at any given time as the entire spacecraft most rotate to point he mirror but that is heavily constrained by the limits of the sunshield blocking sunlight. Scott Manley has a good video on one of the big limitations of the telescope;
Musk would have done it at a quarter of the cost and we'd have gotten forty telescopes by now.I wonder if you contracted musk to do this what the cost/timeline/success rate would be.
I'm going to say 1b / 3 years / 90%+ realistic
I wonder if you contracted musk to do this what the cost/timeline/success rate would be.
I'm going to say 1b / 3 years / 90%+ realistic
We'd have an array of smaller telescopes that are 100 times better than this one.Musk would have done it at a quarter of the cost and we'd have gotten forty telescopes by now.
Funny enough, the JWST was actually made by Northrop Grumman in Redondo Beach, which is only a few miles away from Space X in Hawthorne.
I dont think much of the cooling systems have Earth based applications, which is where a huge chunk of the cost comes from.It makes zero sense to spend all that money figuring out how to build it only to produce one. Realistically the second would of cost a couple billion more? There is no shortage of work that could be done with more and dividing the cost across more units would be a more palatable price tag and it could earn more of the cost back with additional bookings. Unless there is something here I don't understand this process just seems retarded.
An array of telescopes linked together for a massive lens seems like a cool idea.We'd have an array of smaller telescopes that are 100 times better than this one.
Why build one when you can have two at twice the price?