The Big Bad Console Thread - Sway your Station with an Xboner !

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
The amount of stupid in that article is pretty astounding - quoting Infinite as if its development was of normal cost when saying "4 million sales wasn't enough to keep the company afloat" (Not to mention has it ever been stated it wasn't profitable? The stuff I read made it sound like it got them overextended for future products not that past liabilities were a worry) and that "PS2 was selling better at an equivalent point in it's lifecycle" which is blatantly false as we covered here a few pages back.

And with two of three consoles being shit as it appears for the forseeable future, it's going to be a smaller market than when there were 2 strong ones and one casual behemoth. (Christ, the Erikson Community my parents are retired at has Wii bowling three nights a week for the seniors...)

The only "contraction" happening is really getting back to something like PS2 had - which was normal PS1 era was really only PS1 (N64 had really slowed at that point), PS2 was only PS2 - there was a "gaming bubble" the last generation with three solid consoles and a huge influx of gamers - now those gamers are fragmented besides one console. (Speaking worldwide - I know the US isn't a huge split)

Just like MMO's had their bubble for a while. Consoles had theirs that is on the backend now. And that might not even be that bad - even now PS4's aren't trivial to come across - I see them online alot but B&M stores around here have yet to ever have a single PS4 in stock as I've been browsing to date. Not even seen ONE in a B&M store. So clearly there's still some degree of PS4 adoption that's being held back by production.

Additionally, until this generation you didn't have the entire "I'll wait til the game list really gets somewhere" sentiment that has become loud this time - which means there's quite a few people that are going to get one, just not yet.

Or to TL;DR - Thank you for finding an article with tons of holes in it, that only someone who already believed what they were saying would find compelling - it's pretty much a picture perfect example of confirmation bias.
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
Also, "North America" only - funny thing I thought most games sold worldwide.... except Indies that can't afford to get language conversions.
 

kudos

<Banned>
2,363
695
PS3: 244,000

vs.

PS4: 271,000
Pretty damn close for a system that was called 3rd place last gen (also $600).

Let's look closer:

PS2: 299,000

vs.


PS4: 271,000


vs.

PS3: 244,000
Yes, an older system was able to keep up with it's newer version at launch and had a larger # than what PS4 is selling at now. You can't say price mattered for the PS2 vs PS3 because the PS4 is CHEAP in comparison to PS3.

Also, "North America" only - funny thing I thought most games sold worldwide.... except Indies that can't afford to get language conversions.
No, PS4 hardly had a worldwide release. For arguments sake neither did the Xbone.
 

kudos

<Banned>
2,363
695
You continue to leave the PS4's supply constraints out of your little arguments, making the entire thing pointless.

Fact: It is selling out. It can't sell more than it is because there's not enough product for people to buy.

You're terrible at this.
PlayStation 4 in stock availability tracker and alerts

Yep, not hard to find. Amazon (the worlds largest online retailer has had stock for days). The only difference now compared to launch is it's all being bundled up by retailers instead of single consoles which was the usual back when PS3/Xbox360 launched. So no difference now.

IN STOCK AT:
Walmart
Meijer
Samsclub
Amazon
Gamestop

Yeah... hard to find.
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
No, PS4 hardly had a worldwide release. For arguments sake neither did the Xbone.
It's moot - if something is "dead" or "dying" or "hurting" or whatever in one market and it's healthy in the rest - it's still pretty damn healthy. You're going all "FOXNews" style on this nonsense - you're taking an argument you invented, take a ton of corner statistics to prove and and ignore the rest.

Just like shit, you compare PS2's January numbers to PS4's when there's a difference of almost 2 whole months to when they launched in North America. (Plus that whole thing with an extra 6 months that it existed in Japan creating a much larger amount of games for the "Well, when there's a game I want..." people)

Things are not synonymous but you're piecemealing random shit together to try to pretend they are.

(Hint: "Lots of PC gamers are doing it because of better graphics" can easily be proven inaccurate with Steam stats - last I checked over 40% are running some sort of integrated garbage)
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
They must have just had a shipment, because the stock tracker is constantly totally out.

Yeah, grats on using one day of data as proof otherwise.
Online stock has gotten pretty solid the last week or so, Sean. Finally - after 4-5 months. B&M is still nonexistant that I've seen.
 

Szlia

Member
6,660
1,396
They are both selling faster than the Wii so all I see is a bunch of vague generalities not backed by data.

Also, one of these days someone should come up with a good definition for "casual gamers". Are they defined by how much they buy? How much they play? The type of games they play?

If it's how much they buy, who cares about consumers who buy a game a year? If that's the type of games they play, they will still be interested in the console experience for party games. If it's how much they play, it means they will be interested by high quality games that are 2 or 3 hours long and that's a format almost non-existent on smart phones.

Smart phone / web games are time wasters so their real competitors are crosswords and sudoku. They also have an impact on handheld games and children games (non-gamer parents having their children play on iPad instead of buying them a WiiU or 3DS - which could be a problem for the future of the industry), but I don't see them having much an impact on console gaming (they are not even in direct competition for money - smart phone & web games are generally inexpensive unless you are in the 1% that get fleeced by f2p - nor in direct competition for time - consoles are played at home, smart phones games on the go and web games at work).
 

kudos

<Banned>
2,363
695
The entire thing is a bunch of FUD purely meant to generate click-bait really.

Good products are selling well, bad products aren't. That's how the market works. Big studios that are well managed put out games that are profitable. Bad studios that are poorly managed fail and rightfully so. Rockstar puts out products worth the development time and will keep doing so. Studios like Irrational that spend 5-7 years in Development Hell and end up putting out games that don't make up for their over-spending will either close or scale back.

This does not mean that gaming is dying. It's just the market correcting itself. The newest CoD selling less than the last? Hrm, maybe because it's not worthy of higher sales and not a sign that the market is shrinking. Black Ops 2 had an 83 average on Metacritic. Ghosts only had a 73. I'd sure as hell hope that it'd sell less.
I guess the PS3 was a great system when it launched.
 

kudos

<Banned>
2,363
695
Oh, I also like how Kudos is only using NPD Numbers andcompletely ignoring the rest of the world.
I can only use the #'s I'm given and Xbone is selling worse overseas by a large margin and PS4 just launched in Japan. Not my fault they can't do a large roll out like when the industry was at it's peak.
 

Angelwatch

Trakanon Raider
3,053
133
It always amuses me how delusional the "PC Master Race" people are. While PCs may be "better" for gaming, Consoles aren't going anywhere and are just as popular today as they were years ago. But keep telling yourself that console gaming is dying if it helps you sleep better at night...
 

kudos

<Banned>
2,363
695
Please realize no where did I say it will go away. All I'm saying is that it's shrinking considerably and will be a shell of it's past self by the end of this generation. It's not going to "go away".
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
Please realize no where did I say it will go away. All I'm saying is that it's shrinking considerably and will be a shell of it's past self by the end of this generation. It's not going to "go away".
"a shell of it's past self" is "going away" (Atari 2600 has never "gone away" if you really want to be technical... still specialty stores that sell them to this day) - you really should try to be an expert on FOX you certainly doublespeak like one... Either phrasing is still "The sky is falling" Chicken Little nonsense - just a matter of how much is left afterwards... and what looks to be a 10% contraction at the most from how everything is looking right now is laughably smaller to consider anything remotely as dire as you're prognosticating.

There was a console bubble that is retracting SOME - it's still going to be pretty damn big, just not as ridiculous as it had been growing at. Bubbles happen, get used to it...

You are not Nostradamus - he wasn't certifiably retarded.