Pretty damn close for a system that was called 3rd place last gen (also $600).PS3: 244,000
vs.
PS4: 271,000
Yes, an older system was able to keep up with it's newer version at launch and had a larger # than what PS4 is selling at now. You can't say price mattered for the PS2 vs PS3 because the PS4 is CHEAP in comparison to PS3.PS2: 299,000
vs.
PS4: 271,000
vs.
PS3: 244,000
No, PS4 hardly had a worldwide release. For arguments sake neither did the Xbone.Also, "North America" only - funny thing I thought most games sold worldwide.... except Indies that can't afford to get language conversions.
PlayStation 4 in stock availability tracker and alertsYou continue to leave the PS4's supply constraints out of your little arguments, making the entire thing pointless.
Fact: It is selling out. It can't sell more than it is because there's not enough product for people to buy.
You're terrible at this.
It's moot - if something is "dead" or "dying" or "hurting" or whatever in one market and it's healthy in the rest - it's still pretty damn healthy. You're going all "FOXNews" style on this nonsense - you're taking an argument you invented, take a ton of corner statistics to prove and and ignore the rest.No, PS4 hardly had a worldwide release. For arguments sake neither did the Xbone.
Online stock has gotten pretty solid the last week or so, Sean. Finally - after 4-5 months. B&M is still nonexistant that I've seen.They must have just had a shipment, because the stock tracker is constantly totally out.
Yeah, grats on using one day of data as proof otherwise.
I guess the PS3 was a great system when it launched.The entire thing is a bunch of FUD purely meant to generate click-bait really.
Good products are selling well, bad products aren't. That's how the market works. Big studios that are well managed put out games that are profitable. Bad studios that are poorly managed fail and rightfully so. Rockstar puts out products worth the development time and will keep doing so. Studios like Irrational that spend 5-7 years in Development Hell and end up putting out games that don't make up for their over-spending will either close or scale back.
This does not mean that gaming is dying. It's just the market correcting itself. The newest CoD selling less than the last? Hrm, maybe because it's not worthy of higher sales and not a sign that the market is shrinking. Black Ops 2 had an 83 average on Metacritic. Ghosts only had a 73. I'd sure as hell hope that it'd sell less.
I can only use the #'s I'm given and Xbone is selling worse overseas by a large margin and PS4 just launched in Japan. Not my fault they can't do a large roll out like when the industry was at it's peak.Oh, I also like how Kudos is only using NPD Numbers andcompletely ignoring the rest of the world.
"a shell of it's past self" is "going away" (Atari 2600 has never "gone away" if you really want to be technical... still specialty stores that sell them to this day) - you really should try to be an expert on FOX you certainly doublespeak like one... Either phrasing is still "The sky is falling" Chicken Little nonsense - just a matter of how much is left afterwards... and what looks to be a 10% contraction at the most from how everything is looking right now is laughably smaller to consider anything remotely as dire as you're prognosticating.Please realize no where did I say it will go away. All I'm saying is that it's shrinking considerably and will be a shell of it's past self by the end of this generation. It's not going to "go away".