Those are trivial and meanial professions. Nothing compares to working in a call centerMist thinks that medical, nursing, and PA school is useless because each one takes >2 years to complete (not even including prerequisites).
Those are trivial and meanial professions. Nothing compares to working in a call centerMist thinks that medical, nursing, and PA school is useless because each one takes >2 years to complete (not even including prerequisites).
When people hear I have a PhD, I almost feel embarrassed explaining that I spent 6+ years getting a degree I don't use, then another year getting a second masters to transition my PhD into something closer to where I found I wanted to go.
Ugh fine.Once this thread gets on track can we clip all the Mist bashing and add it to her personal pity party in the Shaw? This is actually a pretty good topic for discussion.
I disagree almost completely. Forcing people to get a well-rounded education is actually one of the few things that works about the university system. Highly intelligent people benefit from a well-rounded education more than average people do, though.
The mix should be played with a bit, though. For instance, a CS or engineering student's general education requirements should be mostly business-related rather than completely useless shit. An engineer that understands the business of engineering,is more useful to the economy than one that doesn't. Then again, an engineer that understands graphic design is more useful to the economy than one that doesn't. An engineer that took 2 semesters of history of theater and religious studies? Probably not.
Those are trivial and meanial professions. Nothing compares to working in a call center
I actually think we do elementary education pretty well in most parts of the country.So... basically you think all schools are terrible?
It's not like I really disagree with that, but what do you suggest?
I actually think we do elementary education pretty well in most parts of the country.
If you talk with educators, 7th and 8th grade are like completely lost years for most students. This is where the problem starts.
At that age, a small subset, less than 10%, of students are already mentally prepared for rigorous high school-level courses. Good school districts will shunt these students off into specific programs for them, bad school districts will just waste their time.
Meanwhile, the rest of the students at that age are too distracted by hormones, social/personality development, etc to get much of anything useful out of sitting in a classroom. This would be a great time to put these kids in an experience-based learning environment, and instead of trying to teach them 7 hours a day of math, grammar, etc at this age, get them into community service projects where they can learn life skills, teamwork, etc and burn off some of that energy. You could work some more applications/reinforcement for various academic subjects into the projects, make them into combination project-lessons, this would help prevent some atrophy of academic skills. You could continue this service project into the 9th grade, but during the latter half of that year you'd have some kind of capstone type classroom experience where the students explored what they learned in their project and how they're going to apply that to future learning, etc.
High schools would then work basically like community colleges do now. Currently both high school and community colleges are trying to teach the same stuff for most of the students, we're literally doing it twice, wasting tons of time and money in the process. We should just combine the best aspects of both and offer it to students starting at grade 10.
The biggest problem you have here is that you create basically a two-tiered system where you have one track for very academically focused students, and another track for everyone else, and this tracking starts as early as 11 years old in this proposed system. But from what I understand, Germany already tracks students like this to a large degree, and gets significantly better results than our system.
Pure math is probably the major that provides you with the most diverse opportunities. Work with a few mathematicians now on modeling and simulation programs. All have been employed in a ton of different industries. Also, a good mathmetician can make bank in banking/finance.You are making a mistake in assuming that the actual knowledge should be applicable. What you should be learning is as much HOW to obtain knowledge. Getting homework assignments completed and on time is as important as having them correct, as silly as that may sound to you. Same for tests - completing the test and answering the questions that are asked in the manner requested is as important as having the correct knowledge-based answers. Ever had a teacher that gave you a zero if you did not put your name on an assignment? Go thank them. Ever had a professor that let you arrive late, skip class, complete tasks after their due date, and the like? They fucked you up.
I agree with you on the importance of a well rounded education, but for the reasons listed above. Forcing STEM majors to take unrelated electives is useful because exposure is useful, being pulled out of your comfort zone is a part of life, and dealing with subjects that are common but not interesting is just something adults need to do. Obviously the same in reverse, forcing a history major to take a math course isn't just about needing to know how to do math, but also being able to do something people say they hate and/or are bad at and getting it done regardless. Every student needs to be exposed to at least one course that requires them to look outside their comfortable norm to succeed.
My company's biggest partner hires pure math majors for their CSRs. It sounds absurd at first, but according to the VP, math majors can be counted on to learn anything if given the means and are the natural best at handling nonsensical requests. They do probably zero actual college level math, ever, at all. It's not about being sociable or extroverted, it's about solving ANY problem without breaking down or giving the customer lip.
Medical school is an entirely different animal. Medical school in its current form is an invention of the AMA and I have no idea how you would even improve it. The general idea of it is semi-sound, you pay a lot up front, and then the back half, you're getting paid while you learn.Mist thinks that medical, nursing, and PA school is useless because each one takes >2 years to complete (not even including prerequisites).
ITT we learn Mist is smarter than doctors and nurses.Medical school is an entirely different animal. Medical school in its current form is an invention of the AMA and I have no idea how you would even improve it. The general idea of it is semi-sound, you pay a lot up front, and then the back half, you're getting paid while you learn.
As for nursing, the number of useless cunts with CNAs is staggering. There has to be a better way of doing this process.
Tracking overwhelmingly favors students who have parents who have been preparing them for high school/college since they were old enough to sit up and hold a book in their hands, so yes, it usually favors certain subsets of mostly white people.People say tracking is racist since it will overwhelmingly favor white students at the expense of black/latino students. So it is therefore bad.
ITT we learn Mist is smarter than doctors and nurses.
People say tracking is racist since it will overwhelmingly favor white students at the expense of black/latino students. So it is therefore bad.
The smartest person I've ever met is a kid I went to high school with who got a degree in EE, worked in the field for 18 months, then decided he wanted to be a doctor instead of programming sonar systems.ITT we learn Mist is smarter than doctors and nurses.
I wasn't mixing them up, I was just making a related statement about how useless CNAs are.You're mixing up a nursing assistant to an actual nurse. Do you know how the two differ?
People actually say that shit? I don't have kids in school or anything so I don't follow school related issues too much in this capacity.
But fucking seriously? If black and latino kids start acing their school work they'd be put on track too. People don't understand that shit?
The smartest person I've ever met is a kid I went to high school with who got a degree in EE, worked in the field for 18 months, then decided he wanted to be a doctor instead of programming sonar systems.
He is a cardiologist now.
He told me "it's staggering how many not-very-smart people are in medical school and get through just fine because they have a good work ethic, but then end up being not-very-smart doctors."