which of the other 8 planets do you reside in? b/c it's not earth
Personally, no, I don't think people would stop watching unless she became quite vocal or extreme. I'm not talking about me though, I'm saying it is Disney's perception that moving forward with her would not be worth the cost. Disney isn't a liberal bastion, they're a fuckng sweatshop, they're the living embodiment of the term "wealth gap".
Theyre all hypocrites. Until the boots they happily agree with is on their face they wont realize how wrong they are.Literally their writing staff for the novel-series actively talks about whiteness and the extremist kind of social justice rhetoric. But moderate views on the other side need to be censored for "extremism".
I don't think you're necessarily wrong and I don't think Disney was super smart here, but I'm just explaining why the whole brand she's associating herself with is toxic and something she was likely warned against and then ultimately actioned.
The fact that her acting is not good certain does not help her case.
I don't think you're necessarily wrong and I don't think Disney was super smart here, but I'm just explaining why the whole brand she's associating herself with is toxic and something she was likely warned against and then ultimately actioned.
The fact that her acting is not good certain does not help her case.
what do you have against Gina? she's the prettiest girl in all of MMA and was undefeated until she fought a she-man, then got sad and spent a bit too much time at the buffett, chunked up but still got gigs in hollywood, and aside from the 3ppl that train in bjj, she could kick everyones ass on the board.I don't think you're necessarily wrong and I don't think Disney was super smart here, but I'm just explaining why the whole brand she's associating herself with is toxic and something she was likely warned against and then ultimately actioned.
The fact that her acting is not good certain does not help her case.
You're correct. Disney has intentionally positioned themselves as a left-of-center brand. She intentionally deviated from that branding, was likely warned ahead of time, and was actioned for it.The socially awkward lesbian shut in is suggesting we "read the room". Just let that all sink in for a moment.
But its not as bad as Chaos sticking to his IOOTI routine and acting like Disney has not been injecting woke shit into every crevice it could, even at the expense of money. Remember A Stich in Time or the fucking Captain Marvel movie with Tree Larson going on feminist rants? Selective amnesia is a hell of a drug.
Because his post isn't going to lose them money while her posts could.
Yeah, see, this is what I mean. Disney doesn't want people to be associating their show with this debate. They want to be on the most conservative side possible. yes, public safety, we love children and olds, now consume. That is all they want. You guys keep telling them how wrong they are and that no, people DO want them involved in this debate. And then they made billions of dollars.
Yeah, that worked out great for them. Went from all the fan goodwill you could have to a smoldering pile of rubble.which of the other 8 planets do you reside in? b/c it's not earth
they are the instigators
This has nothing to do with politics? You are so fucking naive to how large corporations function.You're correct. Disney has intentionally positioned themselves as a left-of-center brand. She intentionally deviated from that branding, was likely warned ahead of time, and was actioned for it.
This is not really about politics as much as it is about brand management.
I don't think you're necessarily wrong and I don't think Disney was super smart here, but I'm just explaining why the whole brand she's associating herself with is toxic and something she was likely warned against and then ultimately actioned.
The fact that her acting is not good certain does not help her case.
Actually, her constant trickle-up weight gain and an increasing dependency on Restylane and Juvaderm
Multinational corporations worth hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars have no long term goals or plans and the business choices their high level executives make are done willy nilly with no thought about how it aligns with their long term goals.Imagine being so naive that you're still thinking that this kind of political activism from corps in 2021 is based around "brand", "revenue" or "profit".
Facebook, Twitter and others have shown that they have no problem taking hits to their brand, losing users, losing subscribers, losing revenue if they can promote their political agenda.
They have shareholders. They are legally beholden to those shareholders to make those shareholders as much money as possible.Imagine being so naive that you're still thinking that this kind of political activism from corps in 2021 is based around "brand", "revenue" or "profit".
Facebook, Twitter and others have shown that they have no problem taking hits to their brand, losing users, losing subscribers, losing revenue if they can promote their political agenda.
Multinational corporations worth hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars have no long term goals or plans and the business choices their high level executives make are done willy nilly with no thought about how it aligns with their long term goals.
stakeholders. shareholders are told to fuck off.They have shareholders. They are legally beholden to those shareholders to make those shareholders as much money as possible.
You're wrong.
They have shareholders. They are legally beholden to those shareholders to make those shareholders as much money as possible.
You're wrong.