The NSA watches you poop.

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,202
139,573
I'm just quoting something he said in his Q&A. You have these people who take every word out of his mouth as gospel
That's what happens when everything is kept secret, anything to fill the void of silence is taken more seriously.

I'm fundamentally ok with surveilling the internet*. I am not ok with the lack of oversight and secrecy of it. The potential for political power abuse is too high down the road, literally the Nazi's did the same thing this machine does while they gathered information on their political opponents to destroy democracy in germany but 1/50th the scale.


*The internet should be treated the same way public roads are, as a public space, and also more protection laws should be written to prevent the public space from intruding into the home, like for example disallowing camera's to be built into consumer products that cannot be removed if a person wishes.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
"Everything" isn't kept secret. In fact, much less is being classified now, or it is being classified lower, due to Obama's pain in the ass executive order. In the modern world, you aren't going to get 100% transparency and you shouldn't.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,202
139,573
That was to vague for me, what do you mean by "everything" and what executive order?

Because everything i've seen shows the opposite to be occuring, the rate at which government documents are being classified for national security reasons and the constant extension of when those documents will be declassified is going in the direction of secrecy.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Resorting to homophobic slurs. Nice. Can your security clearance get revoked for that?

I think you should be consulting the NSA chief, because you obviously knew how things worked when he flat out, in front of congress, said "no" when asked if the NSA listens or records Americans' phone conversations. Simple question, simple answer. I might not know the inner working of the NSA like you do (obviously you can't talk about it), but I was going off what the NSA chief said.

HE FUCKING LIED, IDIOT. IF you had been there to consult him, you would have saved him from perjuring himself.
It's like you don't even read the shit you post. I was going to just c all you a faggot again, but instead I would like to plead with you to make the effort to understand the things you are talking about.

Pop quiz: Do you think the FISA amendment gives the NSA authority to collect on phone calls of US citizens?
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
That was to vague for me, what do you mean by "everything" and what executive order?
You said "everything", not me. Andthisexecutive order.

stop editing you fucker.

That was to vague for me, what do you mean by "everything" and what executive order?

Because everything i've seen shows the opposite to be occuring, the rate at which government documents are being classified for national security reasons and the constant extension of when those documents will be declassified is going in the direction of secrecy.
Everything you have seen is wrong. I don't know how you figure you would be aware of how much classified material there is at any given time.

edit again: I shouldn't say "how much", I should say "the rate of" or something. Obviously there is a greater amount of information now than in the past, both classified and unclassified. And that amount is only going to increase going forward.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
I'm just quoting something he said in his Q&A. You have these people who take every word out of his mouth as gospel, even when it displays a fundamental misunderstanding of how our government functions or when it belies the reality of his position as a low level analyst at the NSA. Then he says things that are just so far stupid... I mean come on.
He is a hero man, don't question him, only question the government.
 

Dyvim

Bronze Knight of the Realm
1,420
195
Democratic governments shouldnt spy on their own people, because well only totalitarian governments impose that upon their people cause they fear to loose that power in the future.
 

BoldW

Molten Core Raider
2,081
25
Pop quiz: Do you think the FISA amendment gives the NSA authority to collect on phone calls of US citizens?
It sure does, my favorite gay-basher, though it's kind of a loophole. It's supposed to only target communications of Non-US persons abroad. As Obama said, it "does not apply to any U.S. person." Because that would need a warrant, right?
"same way it's always been," just like "when we were growing up and watching movies, you know, you wanted to go set up a wiretap, you've got to go to a judge, show probable cause..."
So, the only way Americans' communications would be collected (or listened in on) would be if they're communication with that targeted terrorist, right? Not so either. Basically any foreign communication, under your precious FAA, can be collected, listened to, stored. Surely once the discovery of non-terrorist communication including Americans (i.e. no threat to anyone), the NSA destroys that information post-haste, right? Yeah, not so there either. As a matter of fact, communications two 'hops' out from "targeted" communications gets to be collected, even further increasing the collection of Americans' information, including phone calls. What do you guys call that? Incidental collection? Oh yeah, and if there's any question to it, Analysts get to listen to the call (and automatically store). Did you get that? Analysts can listen, based on their own beliefs about the contents of a call, calls WHOLLY within the United States. Feel free to gay-bash me or call me an ignorant non-gvt-worker, but NSA ANALYSTS CAN LISTEN TO CALLS WHOLLY WITHIN THE US. And it's legal. Did you get that? It's Legal, which, to you somehow validates it. Man, they must really love you at your work. You follow the line unquestioningly, eh?

Oh, hey, let's not forget the en masse, indiscriminate collecting of phone records either. We have yet to see the SECRET court ruling allowing this. Maybe you can give us a peek, Chaos? I'd love to hear why this is also legal and everyone knew about it, especially since multiple legislators (you know, those doing the oversight), have flatly said that the NSA cannot listen to an Amercian's phone call without a warrant.

Are you still trying to say that because it's "legal", it is justified. There are plenty of suits challenging the constitutionality of FISA, FAA, and PA, either in part or in whole.

You keep going on about how I don't know since I'm not a government worker like you. You think your little corner of the government gives you this immense insight into how all other administrations and bureaus work. I think that gives you more tunnel vision than anything. I've seen it all the time in all sorts of jobs, professions, and companies.

So what part exactly are you not understanding? Elected officials lying, Analysts listening in on wholly domestic calls, secret court orders enabling en masse communication collections of Americans, what? These are the points I've been making, with citations, and your retort is to call me a faggot. Too bad - I think a lot of your posts have merit when you're not resorting to being an asshole.
 

TomServo

<Bronze Donator>
7,519
11,653
Chaos's argument from authority is stale and tired. Just because you hold a clearance (derp I do to) doesn't mean you have a bloody clue. The amount of people with clearances and access to specific information makes its stupid as shit to make broad comments like he does.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Many different people from many different fields have clearances. To me it sounds like chaos is a security officer or something else to do with opsec.

Edit- if that is the case I get his point of view on the subject.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
Chaos's argument from authority is stale and tired. Just because you hold a clearance (derp I do to) doesn't mean you have a bloody clue. The amount of people with clearances and access to specific information makes its stupid as shit to make broad comments like he does.
So chaos is wrong because he can't possibly know all that goes on with a clearance at different jobs but Snowden is right because he held one job with a clearance that he was disgruntled about and left?

Explain that real quick please.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Chaos's argument from authority is stale and tired. Just because you hold a clearance (derp I do to) doesn't mean you have a bloody clue. The amount of people with clearances and access to specific information makes its stupid as shit to make broad comments like he does.
I'm not saying "i know what I'm talking about because I have a clearance." I'm saying "BoldW doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about and doesn't bother to learn." I spent years attending briefings and training and shit related to opsec, intel oversight, classified markings, etc. You did too if you have a clearance, so you know as well as I do that what is being said here and around the internet is bullshit. And the truth is available to look at, it just isn't some big ass Dan Brown conspiracy thriller so that isn't exciting. Real intel oversight isn't as fun to learn about as it is to just assume everything this Snowden dude says is gospel. Just like fanaskin says "we are expanding the rate we are classifying data and extending declass dates more than ever" when the exact opposite is true. Anyone who creates a classified product has had to deal with Fuckin Obama's new regs. The truth is out there. And not in the fucking Guardian.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,202
139,573
Just like [when] fanaskin says "we are expanding the rate we are classifying data and extending declass dates more than ever" when the exact opposite is true.
rrr_img_32119.jpg
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
Do you know what derivative classification even is fanaskin? I don't think you do.

You are taking a document, asessing whether or not it has information that has been PREVIOUSLY classified and giving the new document the same classification.

(a) Use of derivative classification.(1) Unlike original classification which is an initial determination, derivative classification is an incorporation, paraphrasing, restatement, or generation in new form of information that is already classified. Derivative classification is the responsibility of those who only reproduce, extract, or summarize classified information, or who only apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide. Original classification authority is not required for derivative classification.