yeah.
lets look at this again. first, I was going to discuss how the morality of the "racism is bad" argument is also totally wrong, and in fact kindof justifies racism.
But, then I had a second guess, and wonder if the intent of the writers was lost. maybe it was NOT intended to be a racism argument, but simply just a superstition/astrology/religion one?
if the episode was intended to be an attack on astrology and superstition, it makes WAY more sense. the interment camps, etc, then just really muddied the waters and fucked up the allegory then...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-ghosts/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.8f28c10acb78
This is why so many millennials believe in horoscopes
however, if this was intended to be a prejudice argument, then it was awful. "racial prejudice is wrong because the differences between individuals are imaginary and based on superstition." if that is your argument, then when people are ACTUALLY different, you are saying it is ok to be prejudicial. In the real world, racial prejudice is based on physical, physiological, and cultural differences. This is why the philosophical argument for equality must be made in spite of actual physical differences. all individual identities are born with the unalienable equal rights of opportunity, regardless of physical attributes. man, woman, intersex, skin color, eye color, physically handicapped, mentally handicapped, diseased, etc. it does not matter. they are born with equal opportunity.. It requires an other, to take that away from them. and as such, a society has the power to guarantee, no individual, or government has the right to do so, and it is morally just to ensure that freedom is preserved.