A follow-up for those that don't want to sit through the whole thing.
The original copy has apparently turned up from someone that was in the room, as opposed to the "original release" that had added effects that led the the first debunking.
My eyes cannot roll hard enough at that interview being claimed to be real.
Also, Hi, my name is arithmetic, pleased to meet you! 1997 + 20 = 2017.
I suppose I should believe him on everything else though, right?
- 2
- 1
- 1