The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Lith: "Because men can't lose control and be emotionally unstable? So the males who swallow guns or go on rage filled murder sprees, those guys are just happy-go-lucky dude bros who felt it was the right time of day to go-a-killing? Have you ever read these guys manifestos and see the completely distorted and twisted view of reality they have? Or even look at the witness statements from the Mike Brown incident, see all the men who got the general story right, but then twisted up the details. Or any number of incidents where it's two men's words against each other and both have radically different views of events."

Alright, let me get this straight: You're equating going on a killing spree with accusing somebody of rape? Seems legit.

To be clear, I am well aware of how flawed eyewitness testimony can be. There's a difference between "seeing something happen and being asked to recall details days or weeks later" and "being physically overpowered while someone anally penetrates you against your will". This is a ridiculous equivalence you're trying to establish here, and a pretty flimsy way to support your point of view.

Lith: "There is nothing condescending and infantilizing about believing women have the same character flaws as men. But it's hilarious watching the hypocrisy in your position--Tan. But this is a new fun one. So man rapes, and it's easy to believe he can distort the events, and lie and cover it up to protect his savage sociopath tendency to harm women. So you easily believe, in THIS case, a man can distort the truth. Then you say that it's infantilizing to believe a woman would lie and distort the truth to harm a man---because reasons."

You're right, there is nothing condescending and infantilizing about believing women have the same character flaws as men. It is, however, incredibly condescending to jump immediately to "bitch be crazy" every time a rape accusation is made and it turns out there isn't enough proof to back the accusation. If you can understand that it is not uncommon for women to not take immediate action after being raped, and that this could reasonably lead to it being impossible to find the accused guilty, then saying "Welp, guess she's an emotionally unstable psycho revenge bitch trying to ruin some guy's life" is INCREDIBLY condescending and infantilizing. And don't go tossing around "because reasons" as though there isn't a logical explanation for every single action Emma has taken before and after the alleged rape, you dishonest jackass.

Lith: "When your logic actually gets good enough to not contradict yourself in a single thought? Come crawl out of this hole and talk again. Otherwise I'll only come in here when I need cheap entertainment. Have fun, Tan."

No contradiction, Lith, but if you want a cheap ego boost (which your words imply), then "Hoo boy! You sure got me, Lith! Guess I won't be seeing you for a while! Buh-bye then!"

Doc: "Wow. How sexist of you."

Sorry, I should have said "I am the only one looking at her the same way I would look at a man."
Good catch.



Brikker: "Oh, and Tanoomba's white knighting of every woman on the internet is getting pretty lolridiculous."

I only do it because of how lolridiculous in the opposite direction so many posters here are. I do appreciate that you acknowledged Emma's "Fuck me in the but" comment was likely not meant to be interpreted literally, though. Rock on, brother.

Source plz.

I mean, I Googled it, but everything was MRA bullshit.

Ah! So the "he said" part of the "he said, she said".

That clarifies everything. Thanx.

Sorry, I thought you were trying to present evidence that Emma was lying, especially since literally the same document was used for exactly that purpose in the Butthurt thread.

Now that I see it was just a reason to bring Columbo into this thread, I wholeheartedly approve.

*brofist*

It's in my link, pretty much.