The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Soygen: "Her texts and behavior for months following the alleged rape cast quite a bit of reasonable doubt on her accusation. Clearly it was enough for the school to dismiss any charges or disciplinary action against the accused. I guess the school was just going on the "Feels" system too."

Thank you, Soygen, for making an actual point. I very much appreciate it.

Here's the thing:
I'm not claiming she was raped. I understand there isn't enough proof to conclusively say she has been raped. I NEVER claimed she had been raped. In fact, I acknowledged early on that there is a possibility she was not raped. I absolutely never said or implied that Nangussen needs to be charged or punished.

The peanut gallery IS claiming she made false allegations. There is DEFINITELY reasonable doubt on that claim, but pretty much everyone here claims with complete confidence and certainty that she is making false rape accusations. These are claims without proof, something I thought Rerolled was strongly against.

Like you have just done, many take this point and keep trying to twist it back to "But we can't prove he raped her!" even though that has literally nothing to do with what I'm saying. I know we can't prove that. I've always known that and said so from the beginning. There are 2 scenarios and neither is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I, being a moderate, have held off on jumping to conclusions. The peanut gallery, driven by "feels", are completely comfortable throwing around accusations of a serious crime pertaining to someone who, for all they know, might be completely innocent. That's the hypocrisy.

Lith, i guess I'll take that as a "No, I can't do better than Cad did defending our hypocrisy. My claim that conclusive evidence of consent exists was full of shit and I know it, but my feels and my pride won't let me admit it. Now let me cover up my inadequacies by exploiting group mentality by pointing and laughing at you rather than countering anything you've said."

Fana: "you can't prove shit moron"

Now, now, Fana, let's not get carried away here.

Deep breath, OK? Let's do it together. Ready?

3... 2... *inhale* ... (hold it)... *exhale*

There we go. Now, what exactly is it you think I was trying to prove? 1 sentence would be fine. A quote would be even better.

Fana: "This is what you accused khalid of except the same thing is applicable to you as shown by the "fixed" quote. explain how you aren't going off feels data"

I think you mean Cad, not Khalid. Yes, Cad is super confident Sulkowicz is a false rape accuser, even though there isn't enough evidence to prove it. Ipso facto, he is using feels in lieu of conclusive data.

With me so far?

OK, now I don't know if you realize this, but you actually didn't answer my question. If you think I'm using "feels data", then to what ends? What am I using "feels data" to try to prove here? Which of my conclusions have come from "feels data", according to you?

Fana: "No I don't mean cad, and who the fuck knows with you, you'd actually have to take a stance"

Whoa, whoa... You lost me again.

Where exactly do you think I was accusing Khalid of something? I haven't addressed him in ages. I think I would know if I accused him of something.

Also, watch yourself with that "You'd have to take a stance" bullshit. I've seen this pattern many times before: Some posters say stupid shit, usually about somebody they need to believe is a villain, I point out the flaws in their arguments, They point out flaws in arguments I HAVEN'T MADE, I get accused of not taking a stance. I'm sorry if I'm not saying whatever ridiculous shit you need me to say in order to be able to contradict me. That doesn't mean I haven't taken a stance.



Vorph: "Still doesn't make the game or the game's creators misogynist, and that's the part we're supposed to be fighting against."

So... Who's saying that? I'm not calling you a liar, it's entirely possible I don't follow SJW ramblings as closely as you do. I can say the apparent spokesperson for criticizing how women are portrayed in video games is Sarkeesian, and I don't think she claims the games themselves are misogynistic and she CERTAINLY never claimed the creators were misogynistic. Maybe someone else made those claims, I'm just curious who.

Fana: "You addressed him directly last page? wtf are you smoking..."

I'm not seeing it, brother. Can you find a quote or something?

Also, I don't like to draw attention to who I have on "ignore" because I consider that childish and petty, but if it helps clear anything up, I don't read Khalid's posts. This is why I'm finding it weird that you think I've accused him of something.

Fana: "I am mistaken"

I'm proud of you. That couldn't have been easy, especially after your "wtf are you smoking" prickishness.

Now, are you ready to admit you were wrong about taxi drivers being as popular targets as hookers in GTA? And about Boxxy having made videos criticizing Sarkeesian?

We might be able to make an honest man out of you yet.