Agreed. The whole ambiguity is annoying as hell. It's almost like the writers don't know if they want to do anything so they're going to just leave it up in the air until they decide.The whole rape storyline is unbelievably overblown.
honestly who gives a shit if she was raped anyway. If I was on that show I'd just be glad every night I can go to sleep and not have killed my zombified family that day.She wasn't raped. Glenn pretty much thinks she was, though. Viewers tend to forget they see stuff the characters don't. As far as Glenn's POV is concerned, she was.
I understand that, i was trying to make the point that the whole scene was toned down for TV from the comics and that they should of just left it out. It didnt do anything for the governors character and in the comics it really showed what kind of crazy fucktard he was. So by changing it to "he touched my boobies" AMC did nothing but hurt is character.Why does it matter if you read the comics or not? They've diverged the storylines so much the characters only vaguely resemble their comic counterparts.
I dont know the reasoning behind it, maybe it was the insinuation of the act. You said it yourself that the Gov likes to have people he can control and by using the insinuation of "im gonna rape you" he got something from that. who knows with the terribad writing what the hell is going on anymore.That is the confusing part. He grabbed her tit and they are both losing their shit... if someone grabbed my wife's tit today, I'd be kind of pissed, but life would go on.
Considering it is not his baby and only represents how shitty the world is now I'd use that baby as some zombie veal the first chance I could. First thing I told my GF with the baby is I'd strap it to my belt like a grenade and if shit got bad just rip the baby off my belt and chuck it as a zombie lure.Does anyone else think Rick had this moment where he wanted to smash the baby into the wall?