This is confirmation of how good this show was.A twist would have been more interesting than the anticlimactic crap we got for the last 3 or 4 episodes. Why even reveal the killer? Nothing has been resolved.
Harrelson and McConaughey had great chemistry and the first half of the season was amazing, but the show lost steam after they abruptly jumped ahead to 2002. And it definitely could have done without all the nebulous imagery and symbolism.
He was imitating James Mason who was on his television at the time in North by Northwest.Why was the killer speaking like a British chap in his house? Weird as fuck.
When I was watching the show, I thought it looked like an old Spanish slave market, which made it seem like an even darker, epicenter of misery.It was a civil war fort. That 5 min video posted earlier answered a ton of questions.
Alternatively, if you're gonna finger your fat, dim-witted, face-like-a-foot half-sister then you might as spice things up a little with a British accent.He was imitating James Mason who was on his television at the time in North by Northwest.
So it'll be set in DC and be about how the Freemasons fucked and murdered their way to arranging the city streets into a pentagram?Nic Pizzolatto: Okay. This is really early, but I'll tell you (it's about) hard women, bad men and the secret occult history of the United States transportation system.
it looked very strange to me. the up shot of Marty with the stars behind him was odd looking.I think the last scene was added/filmed much later.
Would you say it was somewhatTrue?! *zingfart*If anything, I appreciate that it was somewhat realistic in that sense.
Marty's first speech to Rust pretty much set the tone for the entire season, telling him that once you start applying your own shit you start writing your own narrative. So it was pretty meta, but to me that was how they explained what was really going on while toying with us.So, how did the opening scene of the series tie into anything in season 1?