Ah yes. Calling into question the variable evolutionary malleability of certain traits, and asking for a definition of intelligence is 'politics'.
No, but setting up strawman arguments is a strong sign of politically motivated positions.Ah yes. Calling into question the variable evolutionary malleability of certain traits, and asking for a definition of intelligence is 'politics'.
No, but setting up strawman arguments is a strong sign of politically motivated positions.
Stefan Molyneux is not the intellectual he would have you believe that he is.
Outside of a few select topics, his content is pretty fucking terrible.
Which would be my whole entire point with the guy. He misunderstands biology. I like him, but I'll stick with his philo stuff and won't consider him any sort of biologically minded guy. He mentioned G factor which is a semi-useful tool for thinking about intelligence but isn't some solid holy grail. IQ is such a sloppy way to measure things in the first place and since he doesn't understand evolutionary biology he thinks that that sloppy measurement is determined genetically over the course of just a few thousand years and is primarily determined by skull size.
Stick to slaying Marxists Stef. You're better at that. They also don't understand biology.
Dean would fucking wreck that cunt. He's killed people on suspicion of being a monster with less evidence.