hahaha. I read the first few words of that comment on the article and skipped it because I knew what was coming, but with that pic it's gold, Ridas, gold!
hahaha. I read the first few words of that comment on the article and skipped it because I knew what was coming, but with that pic it's gold, Ridas, gold!
Actually I read somewhere that he basically harassed girls at a house party for not paying attention to him, and even tried to push a couple of them off of a balcony. The males at the party then pushed him off the same balcony and kicked his ass, resulting in him being on crutches.I bet nobody ever kicked his ass. Not even his parents.
What exactly are you arguing? That the facts presented are wrong, that misogyny is okay, that Rodgers wasn't misogynistic, that misogyny shouldn't be fought against because it can never fully be stamped out, or something else?What Elliot Rodger Said About Women Reveals Why We Need to Stamp Out Misogyny - PolicyMic
This is the shit i'm dealing with on Facebook right now. I'm going to lose a lot of "friends" today.
I don't think it's hard to imagine that to him buying a hooker would be beneath him and not a "gentleman." He had his sights set on only the hottest of women.Im going with the dude was a closeted gay in a very anti gay family or something similar. At the very least as everyones said he could of just gone the hooker route, but didnt. That kind of says a lot.
Of course he really could of already banged a girl or two and is just batshit crazy and took on a perma virgin persona.
I have a bit of it on my facebook wall as well. My response is "the dude was crazy." You can't start a reasonable conversation about changing thought processes when your poster child is a nutjob. He would have snapped and killed people regardless of his views on women, because he was crazy. If it wasn't the women who wouldn't let crazy put their dick in them, it would be the guys on the basketball team who wouldn't let crazy shoot around. Antisocial nutjob should be the focus, not whatever fucked up views he had on stuff.What exactly are you arguing? That the facts presented are wrong, that misogyny is okay, that Rodgers wasn't misogynistic, that misogyny shouldn't be fought against because it can never fully be stamped out, or something else?
I don't think he's necessarily the poster child, but I also don't think the information presented can be so easily wiped away with the "they're all just crazy" brush. Just like most serial killer victims are female (~70%), I think there's some underlying societal issues that are foundational for this type of behavior. If "crazy" is a spectrum, it's possible that certain cultural stereotypes about women may help enable someone to think their crazy is more valid, pushing them a little further along the crazy spectrum into being a killer. Remove that and maybe there are a few less killers. Of course, that part is speculation, but the percentage of female victims is not.I have a bit of it on my facebook wall as well. My response is "the dude was crazy." You can't start a reasonable conversation about changing thought processes when your poster child is a nutjob. He would have snapped and killed people regardless of his views on women, because he was crazy. If it wasn't the women who wouldn't let crazy put their dick in them, it would be the guys on the basketball team who wouldn't let crazy shoot around. Antisocial nutjob should be the focus, not whatever fucked up views he had on stuff.
His behavior makes perfect sense. This little cunt was completely terrified of women, which is why he never got laid in the first place. Better to just shoot them from a distance than to get close to them and risk having his precious little snowflake feewings hurt by a mean girl who just doesn't understand how much of a special wittle gentleman he is.if you were going to go on a homicidal killing spree that would lead to your death because you're a virgin, wouldn't you rape a bitch or two before the spree began? i don't get this guy's logic.
Why seek nonsensical and complex explanations to something that is as simple as 'women make easier victims'.I don't think he's necessarily the poster child, but I also don't think the information presented can be so easily wiped away with the "they're all just crazy" brush. Just like most serial killer victims are female (~70%), I think there's some underlying societal issues that are foundational for this type of behavior. If "crazy" is a spectrum, it's possible that certain cultural stereotypes about women may help enable someone to think their crazy is more valid, pushing them a little further along the crazy spectrum into being a killer. Remove that and maybe there are a few less killers. Of course, that part is speculation, but the percentage of female victims is not.
Not only this, but in that perfect world of his dreams that he laid out in his manifesto, the one where he was the Supreme Divine Ruler of All, he had most of the world's women starved to death and only a few set aside to continue the species through artificial insemination. He couldn't even get laid in his own fuckin' fantasy world. Claiming your queen and establishing your collection of concubines has got to be somewhere your first five moves as Supreme Ruler ffs.if you were going to go on a homicidal killing spree that would lead to your death because you're a virgin, wouldn't you rape a bitch or two before the spree began? i don't get this guy's logic.
Because that simple explanation completely ignores the hatred often expressed towards women and the thought put into choosing said victims (serial killers even more so than mass killers). If it was just about ease, then that wouldn't happen.Why seek nonsensical and complex explanations to something that is as simple as 'women make easier victims'.
Pretty much. Less likely/be able to fight back, less physically dangerous (on average) and less likely to use violence in most cases. Also, serial killers tend to use much more intimate methods than guns, so you tend to need to be able to physically overpower your target in many cases.Why seek nonsensical and complex explanations to something that is as simple as 'women make easier victims'.
He's a narcissist who thought everyone owed him everything. He wasn't about to pay for pussy, as it wouldn't validate the shit he was whining about.Im going with the dude was a closeted gay in a very anti gay family or something similar. At the very least as everyones said he could of just gone the hooker route, but didnt. That kind of says a lot.
Of course he really could of already banged a girl or two and is just batshit crazy and took on a perma virgin persona.