Crisco
A greasy jar
- 265
- 448
Fully depends on the shitposting and continued mod abuse. Don't go all straight and narrow on us.Thanks for speaking up.
Can i count on your vote in the next mod election?
- 7
- 1
Fully depends on the shitposting and continued mod abuse. Don't go all straight and narrow on us.Thanks for speaking up.
Can i count on your vote in the next mod election?
Fully depends on the shitposting and continued mod abuse. Don't go all straight and narrow on us.
The first time I posted Ut responded and after that I didnt really care to post more. I am happy to see him gone and don't want to see him again. With him gone, I may post more without having to see his retarded walls of text and lies.
He is responsible for at least 1 member to stay a lurker.
but the only reason to permanent ban someone (in my opinion) is if they doxx (or threaten to) other posters,
well he tried to dox the new guy, so there's thatInteresting to see the "No" votes swing way the fuck up after more and more people learn about Ut's history
It'd be interesting if the poll wasn't private. Nobody that picked yes has actually posted yet.
I just assume if the total yes' beat the total no's then the total yes side would take effect and then the sub yes votes would tally and the total "Yes" vs the total "Yes but.." would be compared.
Well we all know they kinda sorta want him to stick around, cuz he brings the "original content"That seems like kind of a bad way to do it, since 2 of the 3 options are for punishments. Right now, about 65% of the voters are for a one year sentence of some type, only about 35% for the first option. So most people still think he deserves some action. And, I suspect even some of the pure yes votes are just objecting to the length, not to a punishment at all.
I'll always be the new guy even in 7 years or something.
I'm still the new guy 6 years later bruh