Lanx
<Prior Amod>
Huh? I made a post ~ 24 hours ago showing split was already 36 hours, and right after that within 2 hours it updated to 40+.I guess...if you ignore that less than 24 hours ago they were still forecasting that they'd collide. I mean shit, 2 posts before mine is video proof.
Not sure why you're taking this so personally. Are you a meteorologist? That's who I was calling out.Huh? I made a post ~ 24 hours ago showing split was already 36 hours, and right after that within 2 hours it updated to 40+.
One curved and sped up( Marco ) T
To save me schooling your ass later just take the L.
See NOAA has this thing called archives.
This shows Marco hitting Monday where Laura( which is still on NOAA site ) you can click archive for Saturdays briefings showing Laura not even leaving Cuba till Monday night/early Tuesday morning meaning at least 70 hours ago they had ruled out double impact.
I get it, you don't watch weather closely as some of us do, but if you going to call someone out, you best go off more than just a random post on a forum as proof.
Tropical Storm MARCO
www.nhc.noaa.gov
Edit 6am- Laura now expected to be cat 3 on landfall as predicted by me.
View attachment 296489
Not NOAA. NOAA branched off that event on Friday and even then they are still wrong. Technically Marco only made landfall on like a 300 foot of breach jetted way out in the ocean. I reacted because you said the 24 hours prior comment in counter to my post. It was wrong. It isn't your fault it is wrong or even the posters as what happens is media is so Fing lazy they often post data day(s) old instead of taking 5 minutes to check NOAA and NOAA puts it in such simple terms even a child can read it and see what is happening. As for meteorologist, many of us here are actually better at this shit then the old fossils most TV news has. We've had many discussions here where we put our collective minds and info from places like Windy and Ventusky which is nice enough to combine all the models which is what forecasts are based on anyways and draw a better possibility than they often they do. That comes from years of watching, learning and having interest in it.Not sure why you're taking this so personally. Are you a meteorologist? That's who I was calling out.
And I'll point again to 2 posts previous to mine where they were still modeling the hurricanes colliding as of Sunday night. Is that NOAA? Fuck if I know, their website sucks.
Think of how hard it was to gather this data and do this back then.The 1933 twins. Cool map.
View attachment 296552
Think of how hard it was to gather this data and do this back then.
Now some dude sits in his chair and hits a button on his keyboard and he determines which of the mom's spaghetti is right with computers and sats doing 99% of the work.
Was only a handful of years ago Musk got laughed out of a science group for saying he would land and reuse rockets. The launch last week was the first time a booster had been used 6 times and it landed so probably make a 7th.That is exactly what bowls me over. I just look, "hmm, let's see where we were at 100 years ago," or 200 years, and learn my damn history, and then really get amazed.
A century, even 2 centuries, is a snap of the finger. And here we fuckin are. Flying aircraft into hurricanes, which we watch from satellites lol. Which we launched into space so we could, among many other things, more effectively watch hurricanes.
that white mass is laura? jesus she looks like a mean bitchFlat Earth Society posted this image of Laura, along with proof world is flat.
View attachment 296585
Flat Earth Society posted this image of Laura, along with proof world is flat.
View attachment 296585
It's pulled much of Marco into it piece by piece. Eyewall is still recovering from Cuba but it almost appears as 2 massive storms on sat atm.that white mass is laura? jesus she looks like a mean bitch