Faux
Are you conceding or not, because all your two posts look like is some wishy-washy attempt to simultaneously concede whilst maintaining that you are still technically correct and right all along
claimed it is shit because it doesn't apply to the edge cases like you.
I've said all along - low carb is fine for someone that is overweight and/or not exercising. The more weight you lose and the more active you are, the more carbs you can tolerate. But nice straw man
Its an attempt to measure insulin response to various foods
Dude, lol - do you think I'm denying that eating carbs spike insulin?
I've already said multiple times - I consume my carbs during and post workout, to spike insulin, to get glycogen to my muscles faster. lol.
What is being debated is the assertion that "you don't lose fat if your insulin is high"
You're trying to win on a technicality :
because even though you were eating 200-400g of carbs and losing fat, gaining muscle etc - what was actually happening, was all the actual fat burning happened outside of the times you ate carbs. Don't you get it?
I've told you what my carb intake looked like:
Breakfast: Protein and Fat
During Workout A: 25g carbs
Postworkout Shake A: carbs/protein
Postworkout Meal A: carbs protein
During workout B: 25g carbs
Postworkout shake B: carbs/protein
Postworkout meal B: carbs protein
Occasional: Dominoes Chicken Wings, Pizza and Cookies
Your attempt to win at a technicality is by the unsubstantiated claim that all my fat burning is happening when I'm not eating carbs. Ignoring sleep when nobody is eating anything, when is this mythical period of fat burning taking place?
It really is irrelevant (to me at least) when the fat burning happened. I could care less if it happened whilst I was asleep, taking a shit, having a wank or arguing with people on an internet forum - the only thing that matters is that I burnt fat and improved my body recomposition.
kudos for totally ignoring the above.