I've also heard them called STAR interviews. This sort of thing:What do you like to do in your free time? Do you like working alone or in teams? How do you approach a problem?
That's what I think when I read "behavioral interview". I've never heard it called that, usually that get lumped into technical questions and it's just called "an interview".
BTW, the first one is a trick question. Just tell them you like to rescue puppies from burning buildings.
These kinds of generic questions are so stupid. I hate answering them in interviews. They're so stereotypical that you can basically rehearse answers for them so the interviewers aren't even going to learn much about you from the questions.I've also heard them called STAR interviews. This sort of thing:
"Describe a Situation Where You Disagreed With a Supervisor."
"Tell me about a time you had a conflict at work."
"Tell me about a situation where you had to solve a difficult problem."
Apparently there's an established response pattern of 1. Situation, 2. Specific task, 3. Actions taken, 4. Results achieved. It's actually a pretty reasonable format for interview answers, but I've never encountered it in research before.
Yup. This would be my strategy. You just interviewed him. Use the exact same questions as a framework for justifying a salary increase. Show em you're already doing those things and more.Hire him and then request his salary.
I think rehearsing is half the point. They want you to provide a specific example from your own history that is relevant to the job posting. Notice I said "I think" because I really don't know. I'm trying to think like a recruiter. Complaining about the process won't help me get through it. I'll give feedback to HR when I come out of hiring on the other side.These kinds of generic questions are so stupid. I hate answering them in interviews. They're so stereotypical that you can basically rehearse answers for them so the interviewers aren't even going to learn much about you from the questions.
I think it's because somewhere, sometime long ago, someone wrote a policy/procedure that says they have to ask specific questions. In my experience, you tend to run into those generic, stereotypical kinds of interview questions in government, academia, and huge corporations. I've interviewed and worked for several smaller companies (i.e., fewer bureaucratic policies to follow) and never run into those generic questions.I think rehearsing is half the point. They want you to provide a specific example from your own history that is relevant to the job posting. Notice I said "I think" because I really don't know. I'm trying to think like a recruiter. Complaining about the process won't help me get through it. I'll give feedback to HR when I come out of hiring on the other side.
Could be. I suspect it has more to do with filtering huge numbers of applicants to something more manageable. It's probably unfair, but that's life. Either way, I've got to slog through it.I think it's because somewhere, sometime long ago, someone wrote a policy/procedure that says they have to ask specific questions. In my experience, you tend to run into those generic, stereotypical kinds of interview questions in government, academia, and huge corporations. I've interviewed and worked for several smaller companies (i.e., fewer bureaucratic policies to follow) and never run into those generic questions.
Was it 7 figures?Coincidentally, I just finished phone interviewing someone who would basically be my peer. But they(my higher ups) let me see how much salary he was requesting. This was probably a big mistake because now all I want to do is disqualify him even though he seemed competent and a good fit.
Is that for the job I looked at your resume and job listing for? If so started packing yet?My old professor didn't come through, so I skipped the referral and went straight to the normal careers page for my dream job. One day later, I just got an email to schedule an interview.
It's just a phone call (they're on the opposite coast), but it's a start. HUGE ego boost.
Yep, that's the one. I was expecting a recruiter to screen me, but they scheduled me for a phone interview with the head of research on Tuesday. That's surprising, since everything I've found online about this company is that there's usually a process of 1st screener, 2nd technical/case studies, 3rd onsite. I imagine it's just who had availability.Is that for the job I looked at your resume and job listing for? If so started packing yet?