Well, according to the law, you're wrong. Even on many Freeways. I'm not opposed to bicycling requiring a license for certain conditions, though it would just be a technicality of course, but could help raise funds for more bike lanes. I'm also okay with bicycling requiring insurance... like health insurance, hah. In general, bicycles aren't damaging the roads, so the argument is they shouldn't be paying for road maintenance.
As rustled as you are, let's not pretend it wasn't angry hyperbole when you tried to claim people were regularly riding IN the lane on a freeway, nor that your 'going 20mph in a 40-50 as response to someone mention they ride in the lanes in a downtown. What do you care if someone is on the shoulder of a freeway? What do you care if the person being slow, and you know there's always a ton of them, happens to be on a bike in stop-and-go traffic downtown somewhere?
Honest question: does it rustle you that you're the one paying for bike lanes? Are you like, fuck those bikes. Or are you like, that's cool, get's them out of the lanes? How do you feel about motorized vehicles using bike lanes, cars parked in them, and people driving in them just because they're trying to get around cars to turn or are oblivious?