LadyVex_sl
shitlord
- 868
- 1
I started reading WoT when I was super young, so that was probably why I stuck with it. It's worth it if you can get past the first few books; Jordan is very Tolkien-esque in his descriptions. Like, I don't need a whole page to describe someone's doublet or their riding harness.
But it is a super unique world, and the lives, races, countries etc of everyone are just so fully fleshed out that it's almost impossible not to visualize them correctly.
I'm sort of meh about AMOL. There were some things that happened that felt contrived, and then later I read something to the note of Jordan's widow specifically wanting things to happen so they did, but blah.
As for Malazan, as someone above said, it's super dense. There are so many god damn characters that very rarely intersect, until he starts tying off all the plots. The first book I found difficult, because it seemed to me he drew conclusions that weren't readily apparent to me. Like, this dude died, and everyone knows that dude died, but NO ONE WILL SAY HIS NAME AND THEY DON'T USE ANY DESCRIPTORS SO SOMEHOW I'M SUPPOSED TO KNOW IT WAS THIS DUDE??
It gets better after the first though, but he still won't really make it easy.
The only other gripe I have with that series is that he goes to all the trouble of making someone a badass and then they just up and vanish. There are a couple of characters you'll be like, OMFG amazing, and then they are either gone and you can only ASSUME what happened to them, or they'd not really talked about again, or if they are it's in a "by the by" from a current character.
But I mean, I guess it says something when an author manages to have so many god damn characters and it's fucking painful when you don't know what happened to one. And the fact that you are constantly kept guessing about 3/4 of the characters moral compass, motivations, etc is pretty neat.
I'd recommend both if you like high fantasy novels.
But it is a super unique world, and the lives, races, countries etc of everyone are just so fully fleshed out that it's almost impossible not to visualize them correctly.
I'm sort of meh about AMOL. There were some things that happened that felt contrived, and then later I read something to the note of Jordan's widow specifically wanting things to happen so they did, but blah.
As for Malazan, as someone above said, it's super dense. There are so many god damn characters that very rarely intersect, until he starts tying off all the plots. The first book I found difficult, because it seemed to me he drew conclusions that weren't readily apparent to me. Like, this dude died, and everyone knows that dude died, but NO ONE WILL SAY HIS NAME AND THEY DON'T USE ANY DESCRIPTORS SO SOMEHOW I'M SUPPOSED TO KNOW IT WAS THIS DUDE??
It gets better after the first though, but he still won't really make it easy.
The only other gripe I have with that series is that he goes to all the trouble of making someone a badass and then they just up and vanish. There are a couple of characters you'll be like, OMFG amazing, and then they are either gone and you can only ASSUME what happened to them, or they'd not really talked about again, or if they are it's in a "by the by" from a current character.
But I mean, I guess it says something when an author manages to have so many god damn characters and it's fucking painful when you don't know what happened to one. And the fact that you are constantly kept guessing about 3/4 of the characters moral compass, motivations, etc is pretty neat.
I'd recommend both if you like high fantasy novels.