Since we are talking 'bout the Pope...
“The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.”—Leviticus 19:34 (NIV)His words refute the words spoken by the man who is the foundation of his religion.
John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
Acts 4:12
Salvation exists in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.”
The meme truly does encompass all non-Christians acting like they can use our religion as a bludgeon against us when they don't know the very basic tenets of it.
This was peak retardism. Did you key a telsa today?Ah yes, woke shit like
*checks notes*
Like Jesus did?
Let's ask our resident retardo. What do you think Sled? Do the trannies got it?Which one is a tranny of color? The last one in the list? That'll be the one then.
“The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.”—Leviticus 19:34 (NIV)
Keep on loving one another as brothers and sisters. Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some people have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it.—Hebrews 13:1-2 (NIV)
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
None of those combat what I quoted you on. I don't give a shit about helping the poor, poor, pitiful poor. I care that the goddamn Pope said that there were other ways to God; specifically against the religious teachings he was the goddamn living avatar of. You are wrong here and being retarded and no amount of typing questions into ChatGPT is going to make you understand the nuances of Christianity because you are a proud, ignorant, atheist.
Man, it is so mean of us to expect the literal pinnacle of Catholicism to remain on message and not directly refute the teachings of Christ. If being "diplomatic" at a conference requires such, then maybe the mother fucking pope just shouldn't attend, huh? Seems like an easy thing to do rather then dismiss the founding principles of the faith you represent.What did you expect him to say at an open conference to all religions
"Lol, all you infidels are burning in hell! Repent and convert!!!" like some Televangelist who snorts lines of coke off a hooker's tits after he tricks suckers out of their money?
But hey, who needs context, right?
He gave a diplomatic answer that was basically "there is only one god, even if you see that god differently. but there are different paths to god". It's like the common example people point out at the hypocrisy of religion of "if someone lives a good and moral life, but doesn't follow Jesus during life, what then?". He seemed to be extending an olive branch that basically said you might still find your way to god on that path. Plus if you look at Revelations (which is sort of fanfictiony, but whatever), they even let the Jewish people get the option of converting after Jesus appears, so the bible itself provides a lore related bit where you can still accept Jesus at the last second and be in the club.
You know how I know Francis was the papacy of Satan? a godless commie piece of shit like you is evangelizing for him harder than any catholic would have.What did you expect him to say at an open conference to all religions
"Lol, all you infidels are burning in hell! Repent and convert!!!" like some Televangelist who snorts lines of coke off a hooker's tits after he tricks suckers out of their money?
But hey, who needs context, right?
He gave a diplomatic answer that was basically "there is only one god, even if you see that god differently. but there are different paths to god". It's like the common example people point out at the hypocrisy of religion of "if someone lives a good and moral life, but doesn't follow Jesus during life, what then?". He seemed to be extending an olive branch that basically said you might still find your way to god on that path. Plus if you look at Revelations (which is sort of fanfictiony, but whatever), they even let the Jewish people get the option of converting after Jesus appears, so the bible itself provides a lore related bit where you can still accept Jesus at the last second and be in the club.
Man, it is so mean of us to expect the literal pinnacle of Catholicism to remain on message and not directly refute the teachings of Christ. If being "diplomatic" at a conference requires such, then maybe the mother fucking pope just shouldn't attend, huh? Seems like an easy thing to do rather then dismiss the founding principles of the faith you represent.
You two are like the retard-take tag team.
Yes. You are arguing something that no one else in the thread was talking about as if it refuted something I said. That's true.None of those combat what I quoted you on. I don't give a shit about helping the poor, poor, pitiful poor. I care that the goddamn Pope said that there were other ways to God; specifically against the religious teachings he was the goddamn living avatar of. You are wrong here and being retarded and no amount of typing questions into ChatGPT is going to make you understand the nuances of Christianity because you are a proud, ignorant, atheist.
Ah yes, incorporating pagan holidays and minor practices to enable growth over hundreds of years is definitely very similar to the pope saying we all worship the same God and thereby specifically denying the divinity of Christ.
Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all worship the same God in terms of a specific deity - they differ in other "main characters" in terms of divine pantheon.
Logically speaking, you are faced with the following:
1) All religions are correct - there are actually different gods/pantheons/etc. This technically would be a paradox since some religions refute the existence of other gods, meaning they could not all be 100% valid in all things
2) All religions are wrong, either in whole or in part.
3) One religion got it right and the hundreds of others throughout the history of humanity are wrong, although they all claim to be the "correct" religion and it is impossible to prove
#2 is the only logical conclusion given there is no way to evidence that one religion fits the bill for #3. Even if you claim your faith is all the evidence you need that your religion is "the one", other people's faith is all they need to evidence their own religion is "the one" and there is no way to evidence either.
Which ones do that? Christianity doesnt. By extension I'm pretty sure Judaism doesnt either, so Islam shouldnt.This technically would be a paradox since some religions refute the existence of other gods
Since we are talking 'bout the Pope...
RIP Transwomen
View attachment 583275
![]()
Keir Starmer does not believe trans women are women, No 10 says
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that the legal definition of a woman should be based on biological sex.www.bbc.co.uk
Legally they were defined as non women last week. Based.