MetalNeo_foh
shitlord
- 0
- 0
VGs failures have nothing to do with IMO them rushing the game in fact Id bet that only constitutes maybe losing some subs here and here. I think at tops VG was/is only destined for about a at best 300k tops subs.Witoubo said:After this example I agree with you Kolle, people aren"t going to be cut the slack they would have. Publishers wont write the "blank" checks based on a design document, some spin and a name. Games and experiences like VG are all part of the genre growing up to where there are realistic expectations and development cycles. Hopefully it doesn"t grow into the mutant that sports franchises has.
You would think after all the money that has been pissed away over the last 10 years the guys bankrolling this stuff would get wise. Doll out the cash based on milestones. Why sink 30 million into something if you spot a lemon at 5? In this regard I commend MGS.
Oh sorry, you didn"t get the instancing system done last month? Give us a good damned reason or we cut your funding and move onto the next shop that knows how to do it right. Oh the big bad "MMOs are hard to make" fairy stole your lunch money? Tough.
I dont see anything unseating WoW/TBC the game just has too much staying power hell if they get things rolling on Northrend expac then you got another garanteed year or 2 at the top right there. And with all the money rolling in they have to have a ton banked for future dev. that or they all probably drive ferraris and Im sure blizzards offices have gold tolate seats.
Obviously the dumbing down of the GENRE by WoW have made most MMO"s that are truly time consuming less appealing. I mean no offense all that extra market WoW has taken arent people that prolly would have enjoyed EQ originally either.
PS: blizzard I better get some god damn DK"s as a playable class lord knows it should have been a release class.