odekthal_sl
shitlord
- 80
- 0
50-80 depending on how much is going on
biggest fps increase for most people seems to be to disable shadows
biggest fps increase for most people seems to be to disable shadows
hmm, asus hd6970drect cuII and i72600k i have around 50-80 dps with ppl around (depending on the zone), 30-40 in ilum. over 100ish when im out on the open without ppl. That is at max detail.WHat kind of FPS are people getting? With max detail i'm only getting 30 fps on a i7-4770k and gtx 760.
Considering how fast a lot of the mobs in the early levels (past tutorial) can respawn and get on you again, I think a lot of people decided at Level 10 the class sucked after they got out of the tutorial. If it opens up at 15, they probably were watching other classes rip things up without dying so much and decided the class was too static.I don't understand how people can still be so bad at Esper. It's not like there's some kind of confusing depth to the class.
The class gradually becomes more mobile. By 15 you're 75% mobile. By 25 you're 100% mobile. And they moved the pets way down in levels... so I mean, I dunno.
People saying that Esper is a stationary class haven't played them past the tutorial. Literally.
It's weird. Iv'e tried it on 4 different machines now with the same bad framerate problems. Was posted earlier that they are aware of the problem and hopefully they fix it in time. Dunno how many times I'm gonna give this another chance to see if it improves.hmm, asus hd6970drect cuII and i72600k i have around 50-80 dps with ppl around (depending on the zone), 30-40 in ilum. over 100ish when im out on the open without ppl. That is at max detail.
yeah.I don't understand how people can still be so bad at Esper. It's not like there's some kind of confusing depth to the class.
The class gradually becomes more mobile. By 15 you're 75% mobile. By 25 you're 100% mobile. And they moved the pets way down in levels... so I mean, I dunno.
People saying that Esper is a stationary class haven't played them past the tutorial. Literally.
Hyperbolic much?FFXIV looked amazing and ran really well. Wildstar looks 10 years old and runs like shit and between the two you really need better fps in Wildstar than FFXIV
It isn't hyperbolic. The entire point of using the type of graphics and style that they do is to get superior performance and an ability for it to run on lower end machines. While some aren't having problems, many are suffering huge performance issues that they have admitted to and say they are working on. The clock is ticking and they need to fix it fast or many wont purchase it just for that issue alone.Hyperbolic much?
Yes it is. The games tech is almost a generation ahead of WoW's. It may look cartoony, but the tech there is much more impressive than WoW's was. It also doesn't run like shit. When I first joined the beta about 5 months ago I would have said it ran like shit, but since then, the performance has improved dramatically, and it's still an ongoing process that will continue to improve.It isn't hyperbolic. The entire point of using the type of graphics and style that they do is to get superior performance and an ability for it to run on lower end machines. While some aren't having problems, many are suffering huge performance issues that they have admitted to and say they are working on. The clock is ticking and they need to fix it fast or many wont purchase it just for that issue alone.