question: if women is incapable of giving consent under the state of drunkenness, how do we know that drunk men has given the consent?
Women are equals except when it's beneficial to not be, duh.question: if women is incapable of giving consent under the state of drunkenness, how do we know that drunk men has given the consent?
I think the difference is that one person could be considered the initiator while the other person has to give consent. If a drunk guy convinces a drunk girl to have sex, she's the one being taken advantage of (even if it's a result of the guy's shitty judgment due to being drunk). Of course it works the other way too: if a drunk girl convinces a drunk guy to have sex, she could be the one accused of rape. Unfortunately (for misogynists), women don't tend to be as sex-obsessed as men are, so this doesn't happen as often.I think we've talked about this before somewhere on rerolled, but what if both parties are drunk. If you say a woman isn't responsible for her agreement when she's high or drunk, then you can't expect to hold the guy responsible when he's in the same state. They would at least have to consider it double rape and expel them both.
the law is not equal, but we all knowpost-modern gender feministsdo not exist for equality. irony of all this is that the very same principles of patriarchy, which they despise, is applied in this case. Men is the doer. Women is the receiver. She is subordinate to theMan, and theMan, thus, is responsible.Women are equals except when it's beneficial to not be, duh.
Are you fucking serious? If it's so easy not to fuck when drunk then why would taking advantage of a drunk girl be considered rape?Funny thing is, it's remarkably easy to not fuck drunk girls, even when one is already drunk. Anybody who says otherwise should be legally prohibited from consuming alcohol.
Shut up, fag.Fag speak
no we have not. where i live we dont fuck uncounscious girl at parties. Oh not because i live in a magical place where no degenerated idiots live, but because we 99.9% sane ppl would beat the living shit out of him and trow his dead body to the pigs if someone tried something like thatI think a lot of us have been at parties where a girl passes out and then gets fucked or at least fucked with when she is basically unconscious and has no way of consenting, which is definitely wrong. That doesn't appear to be the case here though.
.
What are you saying, that weareslaves to our dicks? "It wasn't my fault, I was drunk with a boner. It was in God's hands from that point." Come on. To answer your question, taking advantage of a drunk girl is considered rape because you're not getting what would legally count as "consent". Don't like it? Don't take advantage of drunk girls, or at least restrict your fucking to situations that aren't likely to end in regret. If you don't know how to make that call, you can't handle the responsibility of sex or alcohol. It is possible to have alcohol be part of a sexual experience without it leading to rape accusations. It happens all the time. It usually involves not being an asshole and acknowledging that the person you're fucking is a human being. Some guys can't handle that, apparently, and I for one am not in a rush to jump to their defense when their drunken pussy-chasing gets them into trouble.Are you fucking serious? If it's so easy not to fuck when drunk then why would taking advantage of a drunk girl be considered rape?
Excellent post.Absolutely nothing wrong with fucking a drunk girl. Now, if she's blasted to the point of incoherence, that starts smelling a little rape-y. And obviously you can't drug them and then just say they were drunk.
These type of false rape allegations are becoming less common, especially when it isn't just a he-said she-said thing. Back when every single person wasn't carrying a video camera, things were a lot more circumstantial. But yes, women absolutely do cry rape when they regret doing something. It happens. But lets not let that diminish the crime of rape in general.
Fingers crossed it does!(...)Because if she thought the incident was embarrassing for her now, wait until lawyers gather all of the evidence, delve deep into her personal life and DESTROY her reputation in open court. The case could easily get national attention. I think it will go insanely bad for her if it goes to trial, unless the accounts that have emerged are extremely inaccurate.
I don't get it. How isanyof that reflected in my post?But seriously, that was the most apologist, anti-equality post I've seen. Modern feminism: completely equal, unless there is a benefit to inequality. Then fuck you.... and uh, oppressive patriarchy. Or whatever I need to say to get special treatment.
In the furor, one young man who wasn't present at the incident was wrongly identified as a "rapist" online and went public to defend himself.
Wait. That case, while it did get nasty and political, legally turned out properly. There were no rape/sex assault charges pursued. And the guys should be in trouble for distributing pics of a private act without the girl's consent, which is what happened. Really, distributing shame pics is pretty messed up.if you look at cases likeRehtaeh Parsons, it gets pretty fucking nasty (gets political), despite the numerous accounts that contradicted the alleged victim's charges and stories (i.e. refused to leave despite her friend's insistence, getting naked and laughing with the very same boys, whorish tendencies.)
This rape bullshit has to stop before innocent people gets thrown in jail. fuck feminists who are hyping this shit.
Agreed.This rape bullshit has to stop before innocent people gets thrown in jail.
Fuckanybodywho is hyping this shit. And kudos to feminists who are against this shit.fuck feminists who are hyping this shit.
You're missing Trollface's point:She-devil feminists are sending innocent men to jail.Wait. That case, while it did get nasty and political, legally turned out properly. There were no rape/sex assault charges pursued. And the guys should be in trouble for distributing pics of a private act without the girl's consent, which is what happened. Really, distributing shame pics is pretty messed up.