WoW Vanilla+ Turtle WoW
- Thread starter Hatorade
- Start date
Hatorade
A nice asshole.
- 8,187
- 6,611
they have been talking for a few months about removing them in raids and it seems likely that they will. They had an official poll that came out 75-25 in favor of removing them from raids in exchange for them letting paladin and shaman buffs stack.
Jasker
brown please <Wow Guild Officer> /brown please
- 1,512
- 934
I made the guild <Fires of Heaven>.
Not sure if more than two people will join or if we'll ever see a raid, but if it takes off.. to get this out of the way: we can just eliminate 90% of 'drama' by removing any loot council and instead doing:
Loot is done via rolls for every item. However:
For every raid, or raid tier, every raiding member picks X amount of item(s) (maybe 1, maybe 3) designation not certain just yet. Have to think on it a bit further.
This is your 'locked in' item(s).
Every time you lose a roll on your specific locked in item, the next time you roll against anyone for the locked in item, regardless if they themselves also lost the roll, you get a +15, or +20 roll on the item against others that either didn't lock in the item or did.
In addition - If we move on from a tier or a raid and you still never won your locked in item, some kind of roll strategy will give you a edge on your next tier or next raid's locked in item, so no man is left behind from his misfortune.
In addition, I've contemplated the idea that if you win an item that's almost as good as you're locked in item and you conceive it as silly to win your locked in item, you can change your locked in item at a time frame-limit to when you can next have enhancement rolls on your new locked in item. This could be semi-user exploited so the concept needs to be considered further but it likely should exist in some capacity.
The values and properties of these structures need to be worked on a bit, but this system is pretty fantastic and really removes pressure on a loot council and any worry surrounding loot council tactics.
I'll do the overhead spreadsheet work so no one has to worry.
DM me for a guild invite. And tell your friends~!
Not sure if more than two people will join or if we'll ever see a raid, but if it takes off.. to get this out of the way: we can just eliminate 90% of 'drama' by removing any loot council and instead doing:
Loot is done via rolls for every item. However:
For every raid, or raid tier, every raiding member picks X amount of item(s) (maybe 1, maybe 3) designation not certain just yet. Have to think on it a bit further.
This is your 'locked in' item(s).
Every time you lose a roll on your specific locked in item, the next time you roll against anyone for the locked in item, regardless if they themselves also lost the roll, you get a +15, or +20 roll on the item against others that either didn't lock in the item or did.
In addition - If we move on from a tier or a raid and you still never won your locked in item, some kind of roll strategy will give you a edge on your next tier or next raid's locked in item, so no man is left behind from his misfortune.
In addition, I've contemplated the idea that if you win an item that's almost as good as you're locked in item and you conceive it as silly to win your locked in item, you can change your locked in item at a time frame-limit to when you can next have enhancement rolls on your new locked in item. This could be semi-user exploited so the concept needs to be considered further but it likely should exist in some capacity.
The values and properties of these structures need to be worked on a bit, but this system is pretty fantastic and really removes pressure on a loot council and any worry surrounding loot council tactics.
I'll do the overhead spreadsheet work so no one has to worry.
DM me for a guild invite. And tell your friends~!
- 2
Hekotat
FoH nuclear response team
- 12,052
- 11,528
BigDirty
Security Director of Crisis and Weather Management
- 341
- 138
Crone
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 9,709
- 3,211
Crone
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 9,709
- 3,211
Bro .... wtf. Why you creating a loot system that requires so much overhead and work? lol
MS > OS +1 , done
Jasker
brown please <Wow Guild Officer> /brown please
- 1,512
- 934
I don't mind a bit of extra work if everyone is feeling like they're looked after ok.
Loot Council is a bunch of shit for everyone. And.. MS > OS doesn't address people being unlucky. People being overly unlucky or unrepresented in gear wouldn't be good for the guild or the individual.
- 6,308
- 16,981
swayze22
Elite
- 1,211
- 1,091
Crone
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 9,709
- 3,211
- 6,381
- 8,374