I'm anti-union, but I think you're right in that it's not really the problem. I think government interference is largely responsible for the dismantling of union efficiency. Again, just my observation.The Green Party.http://www.ontheissues.org/Green_Party.htmOther than your anti-union thing. But unions aren't the problem, the way many are run is the problem. If the choice was between what we have now, and no unions - well, that's an easy choice, even if I don't like what we have now.
Couldn't agree more. Although I think theaveragelibertarian identifies him or herself to be in agreeance with those stances. The exception being anti-religion. I think most endorse separation of church and state, but support the free practice of any religion.Theoretical libertarians could come close to that. But actual libertarian candidates and representatives are basically never pro-universal healthcare, pro-universal education, pro-gay rights, pro-choice, or anti-religion.
You aren't registered to vote?Where is this alleged registry?! I suck at politics.
Can I register for corporate plutocracy? I, for one, welcome our special interest overlords.
No fucking clue. Haha. Just read it was a considerable contender. I included it in the off chance someone here could educate me/us on it.WTF is the constitution party anyway? Some tea party shit?
How so?The libertarian party is basically the living embodiment of cognitive dissonance.The constitution party is like the tea party yes, their 2012 candidate was a fearmonger and corporate whore in Virginia. I'm curious to see how the Justice Party does in the future. Their platform is similar to the Green Party without sounding so much like the incapable Occupy movement.
But without a change to how votes are counted and how much money people can spend on campaigns, all the minority parties are doomed to irrelevance.
you can join canada and become our pants.No option for "want to be a British subject again" ?
Hat Trollface, hat.you can join canada and become our pants.
"Government can't do anything right! We are running for political office to change that!"How so?
As a libertarian, I'm not offended by that question in any way. I'm just curious as to how you've drawn that conclusion.
Okay, good point. However to that I would say that I think most libertarians today identify themselves as wanting to minimize government, instead of wanting to eliminate it."Government can't do anything right! We are running for political office to change that!"
Can't change anything from the outside either but as Sandman said, it's more of just a minimizing of government and not some high school anarchist wet dream."Government can't do anything right! We are running for political office to change that!"
You can't really blame them for running as Republicans. The deck is stacked against any 3rd party candidates. You can't get into debates etc. as a third party candidate.Imagine a libertarian party whose candidates weren't all ideological hypocrites on social issues and whose candidates didn't all run as Republicans. Wouldn't that be a sight.
You don't register as a party member in all states.I figured it meant which party you areregisteredas....what the fuck is the point otherwise? I vote 68% Democratic but I'm registered independent? Plus that thing about there being a lot of libertarians here, I'm guessing most of them aren't registered with that party.
They could run as Democrats, since ideologically consistent Libertarians are just as close to being Democrats as they are Republicans, if not closer. The reason they choose to run as Republicans is because they're generally hypocrites when it comes to social issues.You can't really blame them for running as Republicans. The deck is stacked against any 3rd party candidates. You can't get into debates etc. as a third party candidate.