I don't think they will be rehabilitated period. I am will to be proven otherwise if the statistics show it but the girl was not even contrite once caught.A) I think the "evidence" that supports calling what these kids did as "cold calculated" is pretty flimsy, at best. Let me re-iterate: How long has it been since you've spent any time at all with children? Have you ever?
B) I don't think that children committing crimes this violent is common enough that there's good statistics readily available to laymen like us. I'd love to be corrected if I'm wrong though. So instead, I'm going to have to lean pretty heavily on common sense, which points entirely in the direction that 12 year old children, almost without fail, turn out to be considerably more mature and rational once they've stopped being children.
So now that rehabilitation is a concern of yours, do you support the argument that charging them as adults will offer them a better chance at being rehabilitated than treating them like the children that they are?
The article has quotes from the girl's police interview on the subject of remorse.Fucking seriously. You guys are speaking in absolutes. How the fuck do we know if they are remorseful? Not a rhetorical question, a real question. The best I can guess is your answer might be, "because the media says so." I'll not go into why that's grade-A retarded especially after what, two days, and you guys are calling for the axe?
As if the posters here are experts on mental health and juvenile rehabilitation?Chaos no shit dumb ass. That's why I asked for examples showing this could be done and so far there has been fuck all for proof .
As far as I know they go to juvenile detention first until 18 or 21 what ever it is. They do not put 12 year olds in gen pop.
Pretty much this. I said it already, but these twats are a genetic dead end. They need to be removed from society permanently for no other reason than to prevent further damage to society as a whole.If they are locked up only until they are 30, then basically we are going to release a mentally disturbed person who has been hardened by a pretty cruel life into the world with nothing but the jumpsuit on their back. I would bet that it will be almost a 100% guaranteed recipe for disaster.
When this first broke, I stated they should be tried as adults, but now that the dust has settled a little, that is pretty moot for me personally. All I see now, is these seem to be kids with the same level of mental brokenness that produced Sandy Brook, the batman shootings, and Columbine. I personally want them removed from society permanently, not out of some sense of vengeance or "justice." But because I truly think these are broken kids who will grow into broken adults. These kids are beyond even drowning kittens or puppies, and frankly I'm not willing to chance it at the cost of another person or many people's live(s).
Regardless of how all of this goes down for the two girls, I truly hope their parents are scrutinized in all of this as well. Something just was not right at the home front if it produced cold blooded (attempted) murderers that were 12.
You just made a whole lot of assumptions there about what can and can't be done and what these kids are. And I highly doubt that the DA did a full vetting on the issue before making the decision. DAs are usually political positions and charging in this case, as in just about every other case, was likely a political decision.I absolutely feel it has a bearing on how they are charged. The juvenile process is to turn troubled kids into productive adults. Kids that are murdering sociopath's cannot be rehabilitated so why would we give them the juvenile process?
I'm the only one in this thread that is uncertain. I said I would be okay with them being charged as juveniles if they can be helped. You guys are the certain ones going rabble rabble teh children!
Oh you.Kids that are murdering sociopath's cannot be rehabilitated so why would we give them the juvenile process?