No need as it’s being handled well here so far and it’s been my wife’s favorite part of the show so far (for reasons).Make a show called Rainwater and have it tell the indian story. That could actually be a pretty compelling as there's no shortage of drama to be had. As it stands right now there's nothing that makes it Yellowstone in 1923 other than her last name.
I guess I disagree on the last part. It’s shocking how many don’t know of how Natives were treated and to the extent that treatment went.
I would have preferred to see it more in 1883, but I’m fine with it here too as it’s still relevant to this era and story.
5 pages of claims about ""historical accuracy"" and still not one data point supporting that conclusion. (Oh wait, did someone link something proving there actually were schools run by Catholics? wow so proofy)
Its neat how historical accuracy can just be asserted. "This is consistent with Dances with Wolves and Disney's Pocahantas so its true!"
Don't bother. He doesn't know how to read.
If your first stop for proof is a fucking podcast… it might be 2023.
I'm going to chalk this up to PTSD.it was literally a 3 minute audio reading of a news story.
More like if it was TikTokIf your first stop for proof is a fucking podcast… it might be 2023.