2013 NFL Playoffs

Cathan

Silver Knight of the Realm
410
52
You can spin it however you like. It's not worth arguing the semantics of the definition of a "shoot-out" and regardless it doesn't refute my point that the 49ers can easily "destroy" the Broncos in a potential Superbowl match-up and you can point to that Patriots game as evidence.
How do you go from the Pats losing to the 49ers to a given that the 49ers will own the Broncos?

NFL is all about matchups. The announcers preach this shit every single week.

Saints beat the shit out of the Giants last year, 49ers beat the shit out of the Saints last year after that but what happened when the Giants faced the 49ers? The Giants pulled in the W because it's all about matchups...
 

Genjiro

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
5,218
5,066
It's going to be awesome if the AFCCG ends up not having the Pats or Broncos in it. Media slobfest denied.
Luck vs Rg III Super Bowl amirite?
smile.png


smile.png
 

Gankak

Vyemm Raider
4,082
2,846
NFC:

Wild Card Round
Green Bay over Minnesota
Seattle over Washington

Divisional
Seattle over Atlanta
Green Bay over San Fran

Championship
Seattle over Green Bay

AFC:

Wild Card
Cincinnati over houston
Baltimore over Indy

Divisional
Denver over cincinnati
New England over Baltimore

Championship
Denver over New England


SUPER BOWL
Seattle over Denver.
 

opiate82

Bronze Squire
3,078
5
Yes, and I think the Niners match-up well against Denver. Denver's D will obviously cause more issues than NE's, but the Niners linebackers are going to cause all kinds of problems for Manning. And the Niners don't have to blitz Manning to get pressure.

Also I'm not saying you aren't right about match-ups. But there are also teams who are simply able to impose their will upon the other team which makes them (to an extent) match-up proof. New England has been this way for a better part of a decade. Despite the fact the Niners matched up well Brady still had a stretch in that game where he couldn't be stopped. '05 Seahawks did this as well. Everyone in the stadium could have told you exactly which play the Hawks were going to run every single down that season. Holmgren's play-calling was so vanilla and predictable. Didn't matter, nobody could stop it.
 

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,743
NFC

Seattle over Washington
Minnesota over Green Bay

San Francisco over Ninnesota
Seattle over Atlanta

San Francisco over Atlanta

AFC

Baltimore over Indianapolis
Houston over Cincinnati

Denver over Baltimore
New England over Houston

Denver over New England

Super Bowl

Denver over San Francisco
 

Lemmiwinks_sl

shitlord
533
6
Its too bad about Houston, I really don't know what the fuck happened to them towards the end of the season. They were looking pretty scary for the most part, but I seriously dont know what the fuck their deal is. There's talent on both sides of the team(schaub is the weak link, hes average IMO), but everytime theyve faced a QB worth their salt, their secondary just gets torn the fuck up. Not to mention Cinci's front 4 is pretty good, so theyre likely to make Schaub continue his shitty streak.

As a Texans fan, I try to keep myself grounded in reality about the team, but I think if Schaub can pull it together they can make a serious run.
 

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
Its too bad about Houston, I really don't know what the fuck happened to them towards the end of the season. They were looking pretty scary for the most part, but I seriously dont know what the fuck their deal is. There's talent on both sides of the team(schaub is the weak link, hes average IMO), but everytime theyve faced a QB worth their salt, their secondary just gets torn the fuck up. Not to mention Cinci's front 4 is pretty good, so theyre likely to make Schaub continue his shitty streak.

As a Texans fan, I try to keep myself grounded in reality about the team, but I think if Schaub can pull it together they can make a serious run.
Please do. If the Texans beat NE then the Bronco's have an easy ride into the big game.
 

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
41,731
143,124
How do you go from the Pats losing to the 49ers to a given that the 49ers will own the Broncos?

NFL is all about matchups. The announcers preach this shit every single week.

Saints beat the shit out of the Giants last year, 49ers beat the shit out of the Saints last year after that but what happened when the Giants faced the 49ers? The Giants pulled in the W because it's all about matchups...
That was a fucking retarded example. Giants beat the Niners because Kyle Williams is a terrible football player. That's the only reason. Otherwise they were getting handled pretty well.
 

Wombat

Trakanon Raider
2,389
1,093
NFC
GB over Minnesota
Seattle over Washington

Seattle over Atlanta
SF over GB

NFC Championship: SF over Seattle

AFC
Baltimore over Indianapolis
Houston over Cincinnati

Denver over Baltimore
NE over Houston

AFC Championship: NE over Denver

Superbowl: SF over NE
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Gold Donor>
15,034
32,823
Cold medicine had my math off, but point still stands. Pats have an easy as shit division and huge hometown perks. Christ, half the fucking NFL rule changes have been to cater to Brady and when he doesn't get a call he is all over the refs worse than a DB called for PI. Seriously half the new rules in the last decade have come about specifically because of incidents involving Brady (Tuck Rule, all the ridiculous pro offense changes). The main effect that the spygate crackdown had was on their Defense, anyhow, not Brady. Its a lot harder to cover teams you do not typically face in the playoffs when you don't know their playbook, for sure. Simply put, they have not won a playoff game outside their own house since spygate broke, probably because of the extra scrutiny that comes with this sort of scandal. The best part of this is that Bellicheat got out of being punnished by playing dumb... and this is a guy who's entire reputation is built on how shrewd he is. Pats also used to get sweet deals in the FA market because it was a place where vets felt they could go get their SB ring before hanging it up, but not so much in the last half decade.

I would also argue that a decade of weak as hell competition has dulled them somewhat. If anything the Packers and Niners are stronger teams because their divisions have much better competition. The lousey ass Bears posted ten wins would have won that shithole division with ease and maybe even a bye, but it wasn't enough to even get them in the door in the NFC. If all the Pats did was broom their pathetic division and win their home games, they still have a two game cusion on the closest team behind them in the AFC East. Compare that to the NFC where teams were still clawing for spots and seeding right up until the end of the season. I think that the lack of strong competition is a big reason why the Pats cannot seem to beat the Giants (along with matchup/style issues) and struggle to beat real physical teams, in general. This is also why I do not see them beating Denver in the inevitable AFC Conferance Championship showdown, because Denver is a much more physical team and had to fight off a bad start to get to where they are. Playing in Mile High really sucks for the visitor in the later part of the season, as well, as I really doubt the Pats recievers are going to want to go deep every fucking play in that altitude. Brady does have better weapons on offense, though.

All that said, Brady IS an amazing passer and will be in the HOF. Cheating or not, he is easily one of the five best of all time (the order of which is open to a lot of debate), but he is not one of the more exiting QBs to ever play the game and I think their are active QBs in the game right now that are currently better than he is (though not than he was at his prime), like Rodgers, Brees, and maybe Wilson (when he is at home). Thats all debateable, really, and Brees was certainly the benneficiary of some illicit activity.

And for the record, Packers are my home team, but I am realistic. I think the Vikes game is a coinflip, as Peterson tends to get fumblitus outside and in playoff games (thanks for coughing it up four times and ruining Favres last run, asshole) and Woodsen will be back. I think if we make it past the Vikes, it will be steadily easier from that point on, given the current rockiness of San Fran and the well known choking of Atlanta. My biggest fear, beyond the Vikes, is if the Redskins make it to the Championship game, because I honestly feel we would lose to them at home in that situation. Were we to make it to the SB, I think we would lose to Denver, mostly because Manning would pick our secondary apart. If the Packers do not make it to San Fran (and they iron out the jitters) then I see them winning it all, because they match up a lot better against Denver and can control the clock.
 

Djay

Trakanon Raider
2,345
396
(thanks for coughing it up four times and ruining Favres last run, asshole)
Maybe that overrated piece of crap should have slid so we could kick a field goal to win the game instead of forcing a throw and knocking his team out of the playoffs with a stupid turnover for the umpteenth time.
 

Beef

Silver Knight of the Realm
90
0
Bengals over Houston
Ravens over Indy
Hawk over RG3's
Pack over Vikes
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
Statistically pretty hard to call AP fumble prone anymore. He had issues that whole season and hasn't since. I think it's been taken care of.
 

Convo

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
8,792
664
AP is king IMO.. Fucking guy wants to be put in to block field goals and return kicks. He's raising the bar of a NFL players and should alway be respected!