Siliconemelons
Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
- 12,139
- 18,271
Looks like the movie is finding its sea legs (ha..ha..) after all- the trailers before where just all mashy mashy wtf plot? bahh ohh action!...now this looks a little more peiced together.
This! I know people complain about Snyder's over-use of slow motion in his movies, but honestly, I prefer that to the shaky cam bullshit that 90% of movies use nowadays. If I'm watching a movie I want to fuckingseewhat's happening, not get blinded by a dizzying, incomprehensible blur of motion and color in every action scene.choreographed crisp slow motion. 'all.
This! I know people complain about Snyder's over-use of slow motion in his movies, but honestly, I prefer that to the shaky cam bullshit that 90% of movies use nowadays. If I'm watching a movie I want to fuckingseewhat's happening, not get blinded by a dizzying, incomprehensible blur of motion and color in every action scene.
I feel like I could grab any one of the hundreds of good non shaky, non-short clips thrown together and they'd be more enjoyable and more memorable than any shaky-short bullshit you can throw at me. Ex: The bourne clip here I don't even remember even though those movies are excellent, the fight scene is just a waste of screen time to me.The legibility or illegibility of a fight scene is the result of a number of factors. Using a lot of very short shots and a very nervous camera can result in illegibility (Batman Begins -> shaky cam) or legibility (Bourne Ultimatum -> master piece).
That fight scene isn't the worst I've seen (as you mentioned, Batman begins is one of the biggest culprits), but it was still a chore to watch and I wouldn't consider it a "masterpiece". All the short shots and constant cutting back and forth make me feel like I'm watching a fight scene montage instead of a single, cohesive fight scene.The legibility or illegibility of a fight scene is the result of a number of factors. Using a lot of very short shots and a very nervous camera can result in illegibility (Batman Begins -> shaky cam) or legibility (Bourne Ultimatum -> master piece).
Did you really feel like that fight had any sense of danger? It was just a matter of enduring a couple minutes of half second shots strung together until Bourne whipped some guys' ass. Yeah I get that it was a well choreographed scene and I can appreciate the elements in it but you're trumping it up more than what it is: A bunch of incoherent shots of a brawl that would probably look pretty goofy if the camera wasn't spazzing out and switching perspectives constantly.My main beef is people saying "there is no choreography" or "we don't understand what's happening." The Bourne Ultimatum fight I linked is both brilliantly choreographed (with the constraints that it had to give a feeling of realism and danger - constraints that the hyper-referential Matrix fight and the athletic performance Protector fight do not have) and absolutely legible.
Lol that is Streets of Rage / Double Dragon irl.This the good ass fight scenes thread now?
TruthShaky cam and fast cuts are used to cover up shitty visuals and lack of depth.