Sure hope you're exaggerating like you always do or this was a stupid piece of shit judge.
He did a good job.
Their complaint was that the job was not done professionally and to their satisfaction. So they requested they be released from paying anything (in their Court papers).
We've developed a system over the years, based on legal advice from more than one Lawyer, where everyone has a digital fingerprint, including call recording and equipment tracking. People change contracts on us all day. The unscrupulous ones add to their contract, and then try to say they never added to it. You know how that plays out in Court. The Judge throws out the addition, without a signature. Now, if there's a contract change, the call is recorded, and an email confirmation is sent.
So, bottom line, I opened with "Judge, this is the easiest case I've ever argued. In their own words, they admitted the job was done to their satisfaction." I played a recording of them speaking to the Office Manager, where they stated the work was "done well" and "done good."
After that, the Judge refused to listen to any of the other recorded calls. He said he didn't want to hear any more calls, and he'd accept my testimony on them. I also showed the incoming/outgoing calls (call log). Two months later, when they finally picked up when we'd called on non-payment, they said they didn't like how the job was done. They told us we had to fix the job, but it had to be set by appointment. We showed we'd called them 20 times in five months to set an appointment after that point, and not once did they pick up.
By the time the defendant got up, he was pretty much ignoring them. They didn't present one piece of evidence, just "he said, she said." They claimed they had call logs showing that they'd called us over times, and we ignored them. But when asked to show the call logs, they didn't have them. The Judge's response was, "If you don't have the call logs, that's fine. They opposing party has already provided them to me." And the Judge wasn't having it.
The Judge ruled that they had the legal obligation to let us cure the problem, and the term of "impossibility" came up also. They made it impossible to even inspect our work. They barred us from stepping foot on the property. We even drove out there to ring the doorbell. They didn't deny that we were there. Once we were there to fix the problem, and they wouldn't even let us inspect it, the Judge said they lost. I believe the UCC code that applied was 2-508 (correct me if I'm wrong) that absolved me of any future work, once they turned us away (combined with the 20 calls they ignored).