The navigational skills to get lost and die sound like the deepest of mysteries that only modern man should be capable of accomplishing.Either it was very lost or the ancients had navigational skills we weren't aware of, the IAA team says.
the "very lost" line was a joke. you can not get lost following the coastline. either you are following the coastline or you are sailing in the seas. you dont get 55 miles off the coast by accident.The navigational skills to get lost and die sound like the deepest of mysteries that only modern man should be capable of accomplishing.
Storms don't happen in the Mediterranean, ehh? Get caught, get fucked, then sail the wrong way.the "very lost" line was a joke. you can not get lost following the coastline. either you are following the coastline or you are sailing in the seas. you dont get 55 miles off the coast by accident.
how do you get caught in a storm following a coastline?. storm comes, you make land and ride out the storm. storm comes, you keep following the coast. it doesnt matter, you cant get lost. you would get lost if you werent following the coast line and were going somewhere out to sea. maybe they tried something new and werent up to it.Storms don't happen in the Mediterranean, ehh? Get caught, get fucked, then sail the wrong way.
It's not like they are a few minutes off the beach waving at all the naked girls down on the Jersey shore. You can see land from miles away. Storms can form over land and winds/currents can push you out to sea. The older the ship technology the harder it is to sail "into" the wind, that's assuming they had a fully functioning sail. If they can't make land, then they are at the mercy of the weather/currents.how do you get caught in a storm following a coastline?. storm comes, you make land and ride out the storm. storm comes, you keep following the coast. it doesnt matter, you cant get lost. you would get lost if you werent following the coast line and were going somewhere out to sea. maybe they tried something new and werent up to it.
from the articleIt's not like they are a few minutes off the beach waving at all the naked girls down on the Jersey shore. You can see land from miles away. Storms can form over land and winds/currents can push you out to sea. The older the ship technology the harder it is to sail "into" the wind, that's assuming they had a fully functioning sail. If they can't make land, then they are at the mercy of it
That reads like pure speculation with no proof of how it got there, only that the crew didn't ditch the cargo. Again, purposely being 55 miles off shore is far from the only speculative guess one could make and I have no clue if it that's a journalist's take on it (which I would take with a grain of salt), or an educated guess from someone with actual experience in underwater archaeology.from the article
"
All the wrecks found so far in the Mediterranean Sea have been in shallow water, he adds.
One of the earliest actual shipwrecks was found off the uninhabited island of Dokos, Greece. It may be as old as 4700 years, but is more likely 4200 years old based on the style of the heaps of Early Helladic pots and fragments found on board. Two were found off Turkey's coast: the Uluburun wreck and the Cape Gelidonya boat. That one foundered in water so shallow it crashed onto the rocks. The Uluburun, Gelidonya and Dokos wrecks could be investigated by ordinary divers, without need for high-tech submersibles.
What are we to make of all this? Evidently, the fact that discoveries of Bronze Age wrecks by coasts just means that is where we found them, not that they didn't brave the deep. The discovery of this merchant vessel, 14 to 16 meters in length, with a crew of probably four to six people, indicates deep-sea sailing ability in antiquity."
Doesn't The Great Pyramid have a bedrock chamber at the bottom?This is pretty cool. Turn of the 20th century an Egyptologist from Italy went in here. This location is not at Giza and he excavated it up until the breakout of WW1. It was later used to shoot a few scenes in the film the Land of the Pharaoh in 1955 but eventually had the site put in the perimeter of an Egyptian military base and has been closed to the public ever since.
Supposedly the Egyptian military used it as a landfill so its covered in trash now. But the original excavation was documented heavily. At the bottom of this steep ramp is a pavement of massive interlocking pieces of pink granite. The Italian dug through it and found a molded granite tub that was carefully sealed with clay and other stuff before being secured by another pink slab of granite. A few photos of this tub and area exist floating around I just can't find it at the moment.
Anyway, the Italian guy was all why the fuck would they go through all the trouble to secure this granite tub that is smooth and polished. When he finally cracked it open all that was left in it was a black residue. Modern archaeology presumes that it was the unfinished base of another pyramid that just never got built. But the Italian documented the interlocking granite and space here and thought that something must be under it or had no other explanation because the other sites do not have granite pavement floors such as this one does. Or smooth polished tubs.
Additionally the Pyramids are not carved out of bedrock like this is. But the Sphinx was.
View attachment 533983
That shit is super interesting. It seems so willfully ignorant or wrong(?) that the site is encompassed within a military base, or is a trash heap, now. Kind of almost makes you want to believe that there is something more to it.This is pretty cool. Turn of the 20th century an Egyptologist from Italy went in here. This location is not at Giza and he excavated it up until the breakout of WW1. It was later used to shoot a few scenes in the film the Land of the Pharaoh in 1955 but eventually had the site put in the perimeter of an Egyptian military base and has been closed to the public ever since.
Supposedly the Egyptian military used it as a landfill so its covered in trash now. But the original excavation was documented heavily. At the bottom of this steep ramp is a pavement of massive interlocking pieces of pink granite. The Italian dug through it and found a molded granite tub that was carefully sealed with clay and other stuff before being secured by another pink slab of granite. A few photos of this tub and area exist floating around I just can't find it at the moment.
Anyway, the Italian guy was all why the fuck would they go through all the trouble to secure this granite tub that is smooth and polished. When he finally cracked it open all that was left in it was a black residue. Modern archaeology presumes that it was the unfinished base of another pyramid that just never got built. But the Italian documented the interlocking granite and space here and thought that something must be under it or had no other explanation because the other sites do not have granite pavement floors such as this one does. Or smooth polished tubs.
Additionally the Pyramids are not carved out of bedrock like this is. But the Sphinx was.
View attachment 533983
That shit is super interesting. It seems so willfully ignorant or wrong(?) that the site is encompassed within a military base, or is a trash heap, now. Kind of almost makes you want to believe that there is something more to it.
Theres a bunch of shit around the world like that - most popular being the depths of the Vatican, and the majority of all of its archives. Why keep any of it hidden? What is the point in that? What about that mosque? temple? church? W/e the fuck it is thats in .. I want to say Jerusalem? That no one can go into and only one guy can go in there. Then theres some ancient temple in bangladesh area that is also just like that, only one person can go in and no one else besides these people is allowed to go into them and all the shit thats hidden in their basements/catacombs.
I really like this channel. The guy is well spoken and looks at only material evidence for what is in the pyramids. Which of course leads to mundane, but very interesting, conclusions.
He argues that the Great Pyramid was intended to not just be a tomb that nobody ever visited but a sort of pilgrimage site or site of worship for the deified Pharaoh. Unlike Mastabas or the Step Pyramid where the portcullis stones were very clearly never meant to be moved once put in place. Going into how the triple gated portcullis of the Great Pyramid could be re opened if a specific configuration was achieved.
He thinks the Queen's chamber was like a chapel meant to show your favor to the Pharaoh above. But he does seem to ignore that the Grand Gallery never had stairs or anything in it. It was a steeply angled shaft that only became really accessible in modern times. It also doesn't explain why the Queen's Chamber was never polished up, nor does it explain why the Pyramids don't have any interior hieroglyphics or inscriptions like the other sites.
Guy also mentioned this book which looks very fascinating.
Amazon.com
www.amazon.com