Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Royal

Connoisseur of Exotic Pictures
15,077
10,643
As long as they keep making actual quality movies, like Marvel, then the superhero genre will continue to make a ton of money.
I agree and I've said the exact same myself before. I don't prescribe to the notion of there being a bubble. I do think it's a protracted trend much like the western genre was for so long. Audiences will eventually move on but the studios themselves are not hapless victims of a fickle market. If they keep putting out movies of sufficient quality they can extend that trend out far longer than it otherwise would have lasted.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
The best analogy would definitely be westerns which at the time where very expensive to make.

That genre lasted decades without any real problems so I see the same thing going for Super Hero films.

People that say it's a bubble come off pretty silly since we're going on a decade of well performing box office films here that are increasing in quality not diminishing.

I have no clue why they don't make more westerns btw. They should, people are still seeing Tombstone for the first time every thanksgiving, and loving that film.
 

Caliane

Avatar of War Slayer
15,590
11,896
I was going to make a post about the "bubble" like 3 times. but kept just trashing it.

there is no bubble. you could argue waves, but even that is barely true.
List of American superhero films - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the truth is, there have been more and more superhero movies, tv, cartoons, nonstop since the 70s. Early years, alot of it was on TV. Made for tv movies, cartoons, and series.
70's and 80 super hero Tv was big. wonder woman, hulk, spiderman, shazam. even real american hero, etc. cartoons with superfriends, spiderman and amazing friends, etc.
Marvel itself was much smaller back then. which explains some of it. They didnt have the power to make real movies. but did have enough to make tv and cartoons.

Even the "downswings" of 84-90 where you have howard the duck, supergirl, swamp thing, superman 4. totally tanking. but at the same time, all those tanking superhero movies, are overwhelmed by the fact they just kept making MORE. And, then Batman comes in 89 and is one of the first major blockbusters.

90's comics themselves were at their all time most popular. teen titans, xmen, etc.
xmen cartoon. ironman, etc.

late 90's also had a drop off in quality, and success. Steel, barb wire, the phantom, darkman 3, the crow 2/3, batman and robin, dredd.
But the volume just kept increasing. All these z listers, and/or knockoffs.

2000 things came back full force in popularity. even 98 with Blade you could argue. but it didn't make a ton. but 2000 was X-men. and unbreakable.
2002 blade 2, spiderman.
2003 daredevil, x2, hulk.
 

meStevo

I think your wife's a bigfoot gus.
<Silver Donator>
6,532
4,817
If there's any bubble, it's probably the MCU. If they have some big misses, push out a couple of movies that aren't that great, miss on recasting Cap and Iron Man among others when the time comes... that momentum for the world they've built and the tempo they release films. Otherwise maybe they slow down for a bit at some point and then kick off a new phase after a break from a lackluster one. It's Disney though, they'll reload and keep going.
 

meStevo

I think your wife's a bigfoot gus.
<Silver Donator>
6,532
4,817
Which I then justified with the rest of my post, what do you disagree with? As demonstrated above by Caliane these movies will continue to be made. What would get people to stop showing up in droves for the MCU would be some poor casting and poor quality outings. Thankfully we don't seem to have many of those thus far (Thor 2, Iron Man 2, some say 3... I liked them all though and they did well enough) and things keep on trucking. They're the gold standard, but if anything in the market could deflate it would be the success of the MCU, nobody else really has anything going that could be considered a bubble really. So if there is one, I'd say it's probably the MCU.
 

Shonuff

Mr. Poopybutthole
5,538
791
Which I then justified with the rest of my post, what do you disagree with? As demonstrated above by Caliane these movies will continue to be made. What would get people to stop showing up in droves for the MCU would be some poor casting and poor quality outings. Thankfully we don't seem to have many of those thus far (Thor 2, Iron Man 2, some say 3... I liked them all though and they did well enough) and things keep on trucking. They're the gold standard, but if anything in the market could deflate it would be the success of the MCU, nobody else really has anything going that could be considered a bubble really. So if there is one, I'd say it's probably the MCU.
Maybe I took it the wrong way. I thought you were calling for a bubble now.
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
27,399
43,512
I agree with the MCU "bubble" if only because of the expectations. Once the core Avengers start leaving things get shaky. I mean, Paul Rudd is really good but I don't care about Ant Man outside of the universe very much. If the rest of the movies stopped and they just pumped out Ant Man movies I'd be uninterested really quickly. Once Thanos is gone and they lose all the actors what happens then? I hate actor changes with a vengeance in most cases so *shrug*. I'll take the next five years with open arms but I just know we will get the lull in between sets of actors and reboots. Hopefully the next wave will be just as good.

Also LoL @ DC.
 

Seananigans

Honorary Shit-PhD
<Gold Donor>
13,895
34,826
Bubble implies that movies will continue to get made but start failing. The MCU heads could just wind things down and chill for awhile after Phase 3, Thanos, and some actors move on. You know, like good TV shows that stop when it makes sense to stop, rather than continuing for 4 more seasons and shitting the bed along the way, like 90% of shitty American TV does.

Just a random thought. The above illustrates a difference between smart/dumb decision making, and MCU heads give me no reason to think they'll start making dumb decisions.
 

Siddar

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,463
6,011
Went to see civil war today line was a good 300 people long. We maybe in a superhero bubble but I think were just at the beginning of it still. Marvel and DC universes are very deep veins of mostly PG and PG13 material. In the past the technology wasn't able to make many superhero stories effectively without extreme effort. Now the source material and CGI advances have made superheros movies as doable as those westerns were fifty years ago. So Hollywood is going to mine the fuck out of superheros. They have barely got past the origins and are focusing oo only the most popular story arcs. I don't see the superhero train slowing down anytime soon.

When everyone here is saying no not another fucking superhero movie. Instead wanting are favorite story arcs made into movies, then we will be approaching the end of the bubble.
 

radditsu

Silver Knight of the Realm
4,676
826
The bubble is going to burst when we get shit like the West Coast Avengers in a movie. When none of the initial run of members are around.

West Coast Avengers:

Mockingbird
War Machine
Thing
Moon Knight
Firebird



Yeesh


Or the Great Lakes Avengers:



Mr. Immortal
Dinah Soar
Big Bertha.
Flatman
Doorman

Double yeesh.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,806
50,629
Westerns were really just superhero movies with shitty special effects anyways, if you think about it.
 

Seananigans

Honorary Shit-PhD
<Gold Donor>
13,895
34,826
Well, they were sorta period pieces. And as America became more and more divorced from that era, they fell out of favor.

Westerns can't really be used as a direct comparison. That's why I dropped back to "fun action-y" movies as a general grouping to put Superhero shit into. Superhero stuff is fantasy, and thus is somewhat insulated against the type of phenomenon that sent Westerns to pasture (lulz). I'm going to stop though, because discussing theoretical superhero movie bubbles in this much detail is breaching my own very liberal bounds of "too goddamn nerdy."
 

j00t

Silver Baronet of the Realm
7,380
7,477
sure, but technically, so did hulk, yet he's always associated as being an avenger. different, i know. hulk was a founding member but left in like, the second issue? squirrel girl didn't join for quite some time though i don't remember how long she stayed. great lakes avengers has a special place in my heart because i grew up just outside milwaukee
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
27,599
16,019
Squirrel Girl was a real character? I thought that was just one of the contestants on the "Who wants to be a super hero" show Stan Lee did. Or whatever it was called.
 

j00t

Silver Baronet of the Realm
7,380
7,477
Nope, real character. And she's beaten the entire marvel universe.
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,076
19,627
mTB9V.jpg