- 27,752
- 32,860
I like your answerThey would have kept digging until they found something on him eventually. Now the police absolutely no desire to watch this sick fuck do his disgusting gay ass-pie smearing fatty does
Plot hole sealed
I like your answerThey would have kept digging until they found something on him eventually. Now the police absolutely no desire to watch this sick fuck do his disgusting gay ass-pie smearing fatty does
My impression was that he was passing it off as one of the old tapes to back up the story.I was wondering though.. technically Saul didn't 'falsify' evidence, cause all the previous tapes were 'stolen'. He just showed them a new video of the same content that the dude makes for his 'patron'.
edit: or rather, that's how he could have played it off if asked. If he specifically said one of the old tapes were recovered, and then showed them that, yes he was falsifying evidence.
Still pretty iffy. The entire case was based on his baseball cards, the tapes were never reported stolen and the police had no actual case relating to themMy impression was that he was passing it off as one of the old tapes to back up the story.
That was the point, they weren't reported stolen because they were private and hidden and the matter was being handled personally. Or that was the lie he sold the police as to what was in the hidden stash they were so interested in.Still pretty iffy. The entire case was based on his baseball cards, the tapes were never reported stolen and the police had no actual case relating to them
"Evidence" isn't "evidence" until a crime has been committed. If there are no charges (Indictment, criminal accusation, etc), there is no "evidence." Saul and his client are free to make all the videos they want with relative impunity up until the point that charges are levied. There are other crimes associated with obstructing an investigation, but not "falsifying evidence."I was wondering though.. technically Saul didn't 'falsify' evidence, cause all the previous tapes were 'stolen'. He just showed them a new video of the same content that the dude makes for his 'patron'.
edit: or rather, that's how he could have played it off if asked. If he specifically said one of the old tapes were recovered, and then showed them that, yes he was falsifying evidence.
Yes, I recommend everyone, especially lawyers, do this. If the police start investigating, lie to them and produce false not-necessarily-evidence-yet to hinder the investigation and see how far arguing the semantics of when evidence becomes evidence will get you."Evidence" isn't "evidence" until a crime has been committed. If there are no charges (Indictment, criminal accusation, etc), there is no "evidence." Saul and his client are free to make all the videos they want with relative impunity up until the point that charges are levied. There are other crimes associated with obstructing an investigation, but not "falsifying evidence."
What investigation? If you report your car stolen and the police ask if you've ever been with a prostitute or hit your wife, you are under no obligation to be truthful to them.Yes, I recommend everyone, especially lawyers, do this. If the police start investigating, lie to them and produce false not-necessarily-evidence-yet to hinder the investigation and see how far arguing the semantics of when evidence becomes evidence will get you.
Except that's not at all similar to what happened in the show. I'm gonna go ahead and say items removed from a hiding place accessed after a house was tossed in a case where the cops are called out by a victim very nervous who inexplicably has an expensive Hummer in the driveway is just a little bit more connected than reporting your car stolen and police asking if you've ever hit your wife.What investigation? If you report your car stolen and the police ask if you've ever been with a prostitute or hit your wife, you are under no obligation to be truthful to them.
Some people, nerds especially, can't resist the urge to "well actually" everything they see in an attempt to make themselves feel smart and simultaneously make everyone hate being around them.I'm really think some people around these forums can't enjoy any TV show ever. I can just see them sitting there watching the episode now- "WTF is this shit?! That would be obstructing justice not falsifying evidence. Fuck this show, if they can't get this shit right I'm out!"
I thought the squat-cobbler was easily the best scene on TV so far this year.