You know, I could spend time citing further evidence, argue that research in 2004 is extremely relevant, or even simply state that I'll take the word of a PhD biochemist whose life has been dedicated to HPV research over yours. But you know what? All that becomes moot and entirely eclipsed when you make a statement that entirely nullifies any credibility you may have had. I mean, I feel almost embarrassed for you:
Now, I just did my undergrad in Biochem, and shit that was 15 years ago and I don't work in the field. But I sure as hell remember in introductory microbiology that HPV belongs to the Papovaviridae family, not Poxviridae, and that it DOES replicate within the cell nucleus, not the cytoskeleton.
"Had any education in virology" indeed.. Oh the irony..
Yeah I fucked up and for a brief moment mistakenly included molluscum contaginosum in the HPV family for a brief second. It was a careless mistake. On the other hand, you're still a fucking idiot who is never going to be persuaded because you haven't done any research on this topic, don't have the background info or context, and don't know what you're talking about in the slightest.
You took one undergrad course in virology and are citing your education in biochem (seriously? fuck you and Etoille both. biochem is the new ayn rand). You clearly think research is sacred and there's no controversy, that a single press release proves something. That shows a shocking amount of naivety, appalling lack of critical thinking and a pervasive level of pseudointellectualism that isn't going to be swayed by a post on a messageboard.
Several members of the HPV family are implicated in causing cancer through integration into the genome by having selected genes such as E6/E7. Most members of the HPV family do not integrate into the genome, it's not absolute or even guaranteed to occur, and that integration process bears no relationship to how invasive and pervasive herpes is. Replicating in the nucleus is not the same thing as integration into the nucleus.
So you're still wrong, and you can't find a shred of evidence to prove your absurd, impossible claim that HPV is permanent. At best you could claim that for some people who have some types of HPV, in certain conditions of impaired immune system function, there may be a chance they never clear the infection. But that's true for most, if not all, pathogens. So pretend it's my argument that's flawed. Because at the end of the day you are basing your knowledge of virology from an undergrad microbiology class you took in your salad days back before DNA sequencing even existed, and claiming that as a relevant topical background.
At least I can retrace my steps. You're so deep in your own ignorance you don't even know how fucked you are. You could have easily found out that some labs have cultured HPV in immortalized cell lineages and pretended like that had anything to do with real life (tm), but once again you were too fucked in the ass right out the gate to even know where to start.