Bitcoins/Litecoins/Virtual Currencies

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,197
23,362
BTC and ETH both up double digit% in the last 24hrs. Could this be the refuge that the Russians are (ironically, IMO) running to with their currency being destabilized?\
Russian oligarchs are in full GTFO mode as NATO moves to seize all of their assets (including physical assets such as their yachts) and they may be making very large crypto transactions, yes.
 

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,731
2,055
BTC and ETH both up double digit% in the last 24hrs. Could this be the refuge that the Russians are (ironically, IMO) running to with their currency being destabilized?

Both of these have been fairly well coupled to NASDAQ/SPY recently, but this may be different since neither of those indexes moved that much since Friday. I highly doubt that crypto is becoming a leading indicator rather than a trailing indicator to stonks overall... so, maybe this is what we're seeing? If so, I think there's a good chance there's another ~10% move they could go up before they recouple to the indexes.


Caveat: all predictions wrong or your money back!


Bitcoin rocketed by over 5% on Tuesday, even as risk aversion drove down blue-chip and technology shares that cryptocurrencies have been linked to for weeks.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Jysin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,457
4,345
The theory is that Russian money is flowing in, as their currency plummets and they are being shut out of traditional money markets.
 
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 user

Lambourne

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,863
6,833
Russians apparently paying well over spot price on those exchanges where they can still get crypto, just to get out of rubles. It seems inevitable that this will get framed by western powers as an attempt by oligarchs to get around the sanctions so I'm expecting the regulatory Eye of Sauron to renew its focus on crypto. Could be a rocky ride coming up.


 
  • 1Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

Jysin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,457
4,345
There has to be some amazing BTC arbitrage opportunities. Get your shit together super nerds and take advantage.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 users

swayze22

Elite
<Silver Donator>
1,217
1,097
I bought some UMA recently - up over 100% with most of it coming in the last 24hrs. (basically just lucked out)

couple others having a big run up this week also - LUNA, GLM,KEEP,KNC

1646159734377.png
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,674
3,072
Russians apparently paying well over spot price on those exchanges where they can still get crypto, just to get out of rubles. It seems inevitable that this will get framed by western powers as an attempt by oligarchs to get around the sanctions so I'm expecting the regulatory Eye of Sauron to renew its focus on crypto. Could be a rocky ride coming up.
I fully expect heavy regulatory pressure coming soon. Significantly higher KYC requirements seem like the most likely avenue. Potentially attacks on sovereign wallets as well depending on how it plays out. We're likely looking at the beginning of the walled garden developing. If you want to participate in the free BTC economy (if it survives) you should probably withdrawal your coins asap. You'll likely be able to deposit them back into the system later if you want, but you may struggle to withdrawal them if things swing that way. Coins on an exchange are just IOU's if you believe in a future where dollar potentially loses its status you probably want the coins in your custody. I am fairly certain exchanges/GBTC/Blockfi etc have been rehypothecating BTC, if true you don't want to be the last ones withdrawing.

For now though, exchanges are resisting

 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Tmac

Adventurer
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
9,969
16,984
I fully expect heavy regulatory pressure coming soon. Significantly higher KYC requirements seem like the most likely avenue. Potentially attacks on sovereign wallets as well depending on how it plays out. We're likely looking at the beginning of the walled garden developing. If you want to participate in the free BTC economy (if it survives) you should probably withdrawal your coins asap. You'll likely be able to deposit them back into the system later if you want, but you may struggle to withdrawal them if things swing that way. Coins on an exchange are just IOU's if you believe in a future where dollar potentially loses its status you probably want the coins in your custody. I am fairly certain exchanges/GBTC/Blockfi etc have been rehypothecating BTC, if true you don't want to be the last ones withdrawing.

For now though, exchanges are resisting



I have Exodus wallet, Coinbase wallet, and Phantom wallet.

Where to move my shit?
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,674
3,072
I have Exodus wallet, Coinbase wallet, and Phantom wallet.

Where to move my shit?
Best bet imo is going to be a hardware wallet for now. Something like Trezor Hardware Wallet | The original & most secure bitcoin wallet. if you own alts and want them off exchanges as well. You can also just run a hot wallet on mobile or something similar if you'd like but its less secure by quite a bit. I don't know any shitcoin mobile wallets but something like Samourai Wallet or BlueWallet - Bitcoin wallet and Lightning wallet for iOS and Android will work for BTC.

Samouri has coinjoin capabilities if you're concerned about BTC privacy but I would educate myself on UTXO best practices before bothering with that because you need good UTXO practices after the mix to avoid breaking the obfuscation.

EDIT: If you're interested in Bitcoin security+privacy practices:
decent places to start




 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Tmac

Adventurer
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
9,969
16,984
My position is that hardware wallets are retarded, because they create an additional level of failure.

Think about it, you have software on an independent piece of hardware. What if the hardware breaks? Where's the redundancy? There is none. You're fucked.

Hardware wallets create a single point of failure, potentially outside of your control, and that scares the shit out of me.

I'll stick to software wallets.
 

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,731
2,055
My position is that hardware wallets are retarded, because they create an additional level of failure.

Think about it, you have software on an independent piece of hardware. What if the hardware breaks? Where's the redundancy? There is none. You're fucked.

Hardware wallets create a single point of failure, potentially outside of your control, and that scares the shit out of me.

I'll stick to software wallets.

The redundancy is your recovery phrase... The hardware could break or you could even lose it and it wouldn't matter.
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,674
3,072
My position is that hardware wallets are retarded, because they create an additional level of failure.

Think about it, you have software on an independent piece of hardware. What if the hardware breaks? Where's the redundancy? There is none. You're fucked.

Hardware wallets create a single point of failure, potentially outside of your control, and that scares the shit out of me.

I'll stick to software wallets.
I'm not sure that you understand hardware wallets sir. There are legitimate reasons to not like or distrust them (trust in manufacturer, device is a tell for crypto ownership) but the above is not that.

Hardware wallet redundancy is achieved through seedphrase and additionally a potential passphrase. These are used to generate your private key. You can lose/steal/destroy the wallet and still retrieve the funds via this backup. Wallet acts as the private key (signing device) for any transactions for your addresses. This device must be accessed and provide confirmation for transactions to take place. As such the device itself is just an interface between the physical world and the blockchain and it stores the keys OFFLINE.

Software wallets can be similarly secure if properly gapped (not on an internet connected device, thus acting as a HW wallet in practice) but in most cases they are internet connected and they have all the security vulnerabilities that go with that.

Both options are really just storing a unique hash that is used with a RNG to create addresses for UTXOs and sign transactions for those UTXOs. If you're concerned about HW wallet reliability consider a mutli-sig configuration and spread the risk across multiple devices.

Simplified explanation on the differences:

EDIT: More detail on how to recover from seedphrase. Secured properly you don't even need the same device (depending on HW wallet)
 
Last edited:

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,731
2,055
I'm not sure that you understand hardware wallets sir. There are legitimate reasons to not like or distrust them (trust in manufacturer, device is a tell for crypto ownership) but the above is not that.

Hardware wallet redundancy is achieved through seedphrase and additionally a potential passphrase. These are used to generate your private key. You can lose/steal/destroy the wallet and still retrieve the funds via this backup. Wallet acts as the private key (signing device) for any transactions for your addresses. This device must be accessed and provide confirmation for transactions to take place. As such the device itself is just an interface between the physical world and the blockchain and it stores the keys OFFLINE.

Software wallets can be similarly secure if properly gapped (not on an internet connected device, thus acting as a HW wallet in practice) but in most cases they are internet connected and they have all the security vulnerabilities that go with that.

Both options are really just storing a unique hash that is used with a RNG to create addresses for UTXOs. If you're concerned about HW wallet reliability consider a mutli-sig configuration and spread the risk across multiple devices.

Simplified explanation on the differences:

Tmac Tmac

 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Tmac

Adventurer
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
9,969
16,984
I'm not sure that you understand hardware wallets sir. There are legitimate reasons to not like or distrust them (trust in manufacturer, device is a tell for crypto ownership) but the above is not that.

Hardware wallet redundancy is achieved through seedphrase and additionally a potential passphrase. These are used to generate your private key. You can lose/steal/destroy the wallet and still retrieve the funds via this backup. Wallet acts as the private key (signing device) for any transactions for your addresses. This device must be accessed and provide confirmation for transactions to take place. As such the device itself is just an interface between the physical world and the blockchain and it stores the keys OFFLINE.

Software wallets can be similarly secure if properly gapped (not on an internet connected device, thus acting as a HW wallet in practice) but in most cases they are internet connected and they have all the security vulnerabilities that go with that.

Both options are really just storing a unique hash that is used with a RNG to create addresses for UTXOs and sign transactions for those UTXOs. If you're concerned about HW wallet reliability consider a mutli-sig configuration and spread the risk across multiple devices.

Simplified explanation on the differences:

EDIT: More detail on how to recover from seedphrase. Secured properly you don't even need the same device (depending on HW wallet)

So, I guess the wallet is stored on chain, but can't be access without the seed phrase, which is stored in the wallet?
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,674
3,072
So, I guess the wallet is stored on chain, but can't be access without the seed phrase, which is stored in the wallet?
A blockchain is a ledger of transactions that can be simplified down to what address holds what coins. So yes, all (Layer1) addresses are held on chain and all wallets are the private keys required to move those coins.

EDIT: No, the seedphrase is not stored on the wallet. The private key is. The seedphrase is your backup to restore that private key if the wallet is lost/stolen/destroyed
 
Last edited:

Kiroy

Marine Biologist
<Bronze Donator>
35,321
102,337
I predict within a half decade all coins except gov controlled coins will be worth near zero.
 

Sludig

Potato del Grande
9,923
10,573
I fully expect heavy regulatory pressure coming soon. Significantly higher KYC requirements seem like the most likely avenue. Potentially attacks on sovereign wallets as well depending on how it plays out. We're likely looking at the beginning of the walled garden developing. If you want to participate in the free BTC economy (if it survives) you should probably withdrawal your coins asap. You'll likely be able to deposit them back into the system later if you want, but you may struggle to withdrawal them if things swing that way. Coins on an exchange are just IOU's if you believe in a future where dollar potentially loses its status you probably want the coins in your custody. I am fairly certain exchanges/GBTC/Blockfi etc have been rehypothecating BTC, if true you don't want to be the last ones withdrawing.

For now though, exchanges are resisting


Any suggestions on a simple safe wallet to use? I assume i can get my stuff off coinbase, but then hassle when I'm ready to sell unless I'm like direct sending btc right? Even possible to hold in a wallet if i own less than a full coin?


Edit, half answered already in future replies i see now