Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
Everyone asked "why", they thought the method of getting there, whatever the answer to why might be, was fucking stupid. If you wanted Hank to live to the next episode, then it should have been shot in a way that wasn't completely idiotic (Like Hank being closer to the car at the start). If you wanted more drama for his death, then the gun fight should have ended on the first shot and started again next episode.The Whatwhat has spoken.
Seriously though, you dumb fucks should be focusing on the "why" things played out like they did, rather than, "HANK, Y U NO DEADZ? DAT WUZ BIG GUN!!"
The "why" isn't relevant when the method of getting to that aspect of the story is stupid and breaks the internal logic/immersion of the show. This is why poorly written shows do NOT do well, all they are concerned with is the "why", like some myopic assholes that don't understand the best part of a story is the journey and NOT where it ends. Do you understand that "durr who cares, da real thang will be how it endz"! Getting to where the writers want to go, in a way that maintains the overall narrative and maintains immersion is the craft of film production--it's what we grade ALL films on, whether you realize it or not.
You're essentially advocating for the George Lucas/M Knight Shamadong school of film writing. "Who cares what happens, what matters is getting to the next plot point in the most expedient way possible!" It's that kind of thinking that produces shows like The Dome, and other ham fisted, terrible, pieces of shit that slog from one poorly written scene to the next hoping to reveal the next big "twist" that some writer just wants on the screen.