Haha holy shit, this right here is the best post in this thread by far. I just spent a full 5 minutes trying to say "whore" like he does in that show. Awesome.Danny Devito likes to bang whoahrs.
Nonsense.I also made some sweeping generalization about a handful of extremely rich, mostly white men, which are responsible for the oppression of everyone of all races and genders, including other white men.
Did you really miss the basic problem?Attending a college is a privilege. If the school rules say you can't fuck drunk girls, don't fuck drunk girls.
In no US state is this the case. The burden of proof for criminal cases is incredibly high.Did you really miss the basic problem?
Guy is drunk. Girl is drunk. they have sex.
The guy goes to jail?
We're already on the path of everyone crying about everything. Do you really want it to keep going?And if dudes want to start crying rape every time they wake up with a hangover next to a whale, go for it.
Or...you know, the other side and claim responsibility for your actions.And if dudes want to start crying rape every time they wake up with a hangover next to a whale, go for it.
You can't go treating these 18 to 24 year old children like adults you stupid fucking idiot. (T Lumie)Or we could do the opposite?
I just can't wrap my head around this. How can anyone be in support of a "more likely than not" policy for getting kicked out of college. Sure, its "not a right", its just college. Yet getting kicked out of college can ruin someone's life. At least require something more than "oh, maybe it happened".In no US state is this the case. The burden of proof for criminal cases is incredibly high.
We're not talking about jail in this case. We're talking about being kicked out of school, one school in particular in that article..
Someone really did a number on you, didn't they.Doesn't matter. Men don't actually care about fucking whales, just being seen in public with them.
Newflash: 18 years old is not old enough to drink legally. If you do something stupid because you're drunk, the school should kick you out, both of you in the case of you both being drunk and one of you accusing the other of anything.You can't go treating these 18 to 24 year old children like adults you stupid fucking idiot. (T Lumie)
If you're drunk and underage, 'more likely than not' is fine, because you shouldn't have been drunk.I just can't wrap my head around this. How can anyone be in support of a "more likely than not" policy for getting kicked out of college. Sure, its "not a right", its just college. Yet getting kicked out of college can ruin someone's life. At least require something more than "oh, maybe it happened".
What is that even supposed to mean besides being a vague personal attack?Someone really did a number on you, didn't they.
Referencing my years in academia, I think it meant that you're fat and whatever hapless men entered you, were embarrassed about it.What is that even supposed to mean besides being a vague personal attack?
Using the "more likely than not" as a standard, you won't even really know if someone was drinking in the first place. That is the problem. I'm not even talking about "drunk sex" and whether or not that should be legal. If you think drunk sex is punishable, fine. At least let that be shown with a better standard than "oh, well maybe yo".If you're drunk and underage, 'more likely than not' is fine, because you shouldn't have been drunk.
We have a drinking age for a reason, and it's not just for driving.
You said a bitter, bitter thing. If we were in person I would have all the non-verbals to go by and this is only just text so reads are inherently scattershot but little throw away comments like that are usually worth picking up and examining more closely. When I combine that with your hated of fat people and some of the other things you've said a picture starts to talk form.What is that even supposed to mean besides being a vague personal attack?