- 25,916
- 51,066
What the fuck MistIf something is by all rational standards a rape but isn't proven or provable in a court of law, is it still a rape?That's the heart of this argument.
Literally nobody ever said this
What the fuck MistIf something is by all rational standards a rape but isn't proven or provable in a court of law, is it still a rape?That's the heart of this argument.
Yes, that's my thesis here. Any woman who is reasonably sexually active for a significant period of her adolescence + adulthood will be raped or otherwise forced or intimidated to perform a sex act that is against their wishes at some point in that period. They will not report it because they feel the system is rigged against them, the repercussions will be worse for them than the perpetrator, etc. And frequently they will lie to themselves, suppress the memory or whatever it takes to convince themselves it wasn't rape.So what you're saying is that the sexual assault rate is 100% and that all women will eventually be raped.
Seems legit.
Holy shit my mind is bottled at the idea that you actually believe this.Yes, that's my thesis here. Any woman who is reasonably sexually active for a significant period of her adolescence + adulthood will be raped or otherwise forced or intimidated to perform a sex act that is against their wishes at some point in that period. They will not report it because they feel the system is rigged against them, the repercussions will be worse for them than the perpetrator, etc. And frequently they will lie to themselves, suppress the memory or whatever it takes to convince themselves it wasn't rape.
Also, I'm sure this happens to a lot of men, especially in adolescence, so I'm sure it's not something limited to women and I'm not saying it is.
I'm not claiming it's a statistic. I very clearly stated the bounds of my data to be personal anecdotes.The only way your "statistic" makes sense is if you dumb down intimidate to some marginal level like "you would have felt mildly awkward if you said no to the request".
THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT ITYou're right, it's a self selecting sample that's inherently biased.
This is ridiculous.THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT
how can you even test for it. It seems circulatory.Yes, that's my thesis here. Any woman who is reasonably sexually active for a significant period of her adolescence + adulthood will be raped or otherwise forced or intimidated to perform a sex act that is against their wishes at some point in that period. They will not report it because they feel the system is rigged against them, the repercussions will be worse for them than the perpetrator, etc. And frequently they will lie to themselves, suppress the memory or whatever it takes to convince themselves it wasn't rape.
Also, I'm sure this happens to a lot of men, especially in adolescence, so I'm sure it's not something limited to women and I'm not saying it is.
Yeah, life experiences don't count for shit I guess. I'm trying to impart upon you life experiences that you can't possibly have experienced because you're not a woman and I'm just being told to shut up because you don't want your worldview shattered.Yes, we are telling you to SHUT THE FUCK UP with made up statistics and bring some actual studies or some reasonableness to the issue.
Yes, I am refusing to believe your statistics WHICH YOU ADMIT ARE ANECDOTAL AND BIASED. For fucks sake, listen to yourself.And what I'm really talking about is ACKNOWLEDGING that the level of victimization is literally unbelievably high (literally you're refusing to believe me) and that admitting this is the first step to exploring the true scope of the problem.
I've already said that the rate of sexual assault is way too goddamn high no matter what the rate is. I'm just not interested in hearing about your nonsensical made up 100% rape bullshit.This is ridiculous.
The victimization of women (also probably men too) is unacceptably high regardless of how you want to look at it, and nothing is being done about it, and people are being told to shut up about it.
That attitude is LITERALLY part of the problem I'm trying to address here, so thanks for fucking illustrating.
Somehow I seriously doubt you represent the average womans experience with life.I'm trying to impart upon you life experiences that you can't possibly have experienced because you're not a woman and I'm just being told to shut up because you don't want your worldview shattered.
As I have never been a woman, I can't say I relate to your experience or what you are saying. I can tell you that I have never once had a sexual encounter that was the least bit rapey. Not even by Mist standards. I can tell you I asked my wife, mother, sister in law, and random women that I know this question and none of them have been victimized the way you're saying. Which is to say, none of them have been forcibly raped.Yeah, life experiences don't count for shit I guess. I'm trying to impart upon you life experiences that you can't possibly have experienced because you're not a woman and I'm just being told to shut up because you don't want your worldview shattered.
At least Cad's counterargument is somewhat reasonable. But I'm not talking about lowering the burden of proof. I'm talking about a serious conversation about lowering the burden on the victim in general, including, in fact, ESPECIALLY, the social repercussions.
And what I'm really talking about is ACKNOWLEDGING that the level of victimization is literally unbelievably high (literally you're refusing to believe me) and that admitting this is the first step to exploring the true scope of the problem.