I have nowhere else to be because I have no life. I'm wondering what you fucks are doing wasting your time arguing with me.
Shouldn't you be like, 3d printing firearms or something?
As opposed to everyone else here, who thinks that anonymous, well designed self-report surveys from a premier research institution are feels-data, but a bottom tier government worker going around door to door asking if anyone in your house has been raped is lately is official facts, even though they disagree with just about every other statistical report the government produces.Unless it's done by the Government, then it's completely incorrect.
I give this thread 3 out of 5 Lumies. Obviously it's the Lizardmen raping everyone in a cunning plan to turn humanity against itself.
I don't think there's a rape epidemic
Survey was 500 freshman girls, ~26% of the girls in the freshman class. Representative sample based on relevant demographic data like race and major. Not a self-selected sample. School was a >10k student school in upstate NY, that's the most she would tell me via email.It being the best information available and it being the best information are two different things.
It's about as scientific as you can get by asking 500 freshman girls if they want to fill out a health questionare and email it back to you. And then do it twice more. That -might- be indicative of the culture of the university being studied, but you really are making an easily avoided error by trying to make anything more of it than that.
How big is that school anyway? How many people generally opt out of these things? General population I would think an majority can't be assed. But if they're all polisci majors then maybe that ratio changes.
The way you're trying to use it, it IS feels data. 1 in 5 freshman girls are raped(*, **, ***) *- not actually 1 in 5. ** -- based on 500 self selected respondents ***- cannot possibly be extrapolated into a general trend.
And I still have a problem with past trauma being indicative of future susceptibility. How do you separate that possibility (which is real) from the possibility of past trauma influencing future perception (which is also real)? You can't get that out of a questionare. You can't unless they had a direct and pointed question about exactly that -- and if they did... why? Of what use would that be for a survey? That question is of good use to a therapist, but useless in regards to a study of rape in a population.
I can't tell who's doing a larger disservice to women in the long run, Mattress Girl or Ellen Pao.Holy fucking shit. Have you guys actually read all of the Nungesser complaint against Columbia and the administrators? Nevermind the Emma bitch, I hope she is unemployable after this but you never know. But look at this.
Columbia did nothing after the accusers outed Nungesser to the student newspaper, posted his name online, had the new york times and Post out him, in blatant breach of the confidentiality policy surrounding those sexual assault hearings.
She did finally go to the police by the way - nearly 2 years after the alleged assault. In the assault she claims he choked her, slapped her, and penetrated her anally against her will. Haha what the fuck. Its hard to get into the ass when the chick is cooperating and you have lube and everything is working. I always wondered how it ends up working when the chick is fighting or you have to choke her to get her to hold still. Not that rape is funny but I always thought to myself that is harder than it looks.
Anyway when she went to the police, they interviewed Nungesser and they declined to bring charges. She then publicly stated that she "decided not to bring charges because it would have taken 9 months to a year to get to court and by that time she would have graduated and just wanted to put this behind her, so she decided to let it go"... meanwhile the Sex Crimes Unit had actually decided not to bring any charges. This bitch is a piece of work.
It was actually one of her professors that helped her design the mattress project as her senior thesis (what the fuck kind of degree did she get, Art? haha, figures) and defame Nungesser with it. Columbia did nothing about this, despite finding him not responsible for her sexual assault. They then allowed a professor and student to defame him openly in the media and on campus.
Emma specifically acknowledged that her "art" wasn't about art, but was about shaming and trying to get Nungesser expelled or threatened enough to get him removed from campus.
The President of Columbia expressed public support for Emma and her "struggle", but none for Nungesser.
This story is more fucked up the more I read about it. People have just sat back and allowed her to shit on this dude without a shred of proof he did anything wrong.
Unbelievable!
No but I'm going to be in NY for a few cases over the next few months and I'm going to check the docket on Nungessar's case before I go each time, and if there happens to be a hearing during time I am there, I will go watch it. Fucking circus this is.Does NY televise court houses? Please say yes.
All Columbia is going to do is say the professor is free to practice art as they saw fit, that they can't control Emma's actions, and they chose not to punish her for breaking the privacy policy because reasons. The case will in all likelihood fizzle out. Doubt it survives motion to dismiss. But it'll be fun to watch anyways!You should bring popcorn, but you'll still probably be kicked out by the judge for giggling too loudly as Columbia mounts their defense.
Yep. The bluehairs will then take this as proof that Emma was raped.All Columbia is going to do is say the professor is free to practice art as they saw fit, that they can't control Emma's actions, and they chose not to punish her for breaking the privacy policy because reasons. The case will in all likelihood fizzle out. Doubt it survives motion to dismiss. But it'll be fun to watch anyways!
heheheh... you said "mount" hehehe...You should bring popcorn, but you'll still probably be kicked out by the judge for giggling too loudly as Columbia mounts their defense.
Article_sl said:A Manhattan model who once dated actor Gerard Butler brought rape charges against a fashion photographer - but the case fell apart when she claimed he got her pregnant and a DNA test proved he was not the father, The Post has learned.
About 45 minutes later, Riabenkova told a doorman she had been raped by the photographer and asked him to call 911, said his lawyer, Tom Kenniff.
Police arrested the lensman, and he spent a night behind bars. Prosecutors soon downgraded the charge to sexual misconduct because they found holes in her story and her rape kit tested inconclusive, Kenniff said.
Then, in January 2015, Riabenkova made a shocking claim - telling prosecutors she was impregnated during the alleged rape and wanted an abortion.
The DA's Office told the clinic to preserve the biological material, and Kenniff immediately asked for a DNA test.
The results proved his client was not the father, and on May 15 the case was thrown out and sealed.