Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Its a parody of extremism that, without a blatant indicator that it is a parody, is confused for actual extremism.

That's exactly what it is. It is a Poe.

You are a fucking moron, but thank you for being so fucking stupid that, even though I was feeling awful for having to agree with you ten seconds ago, you fixed that problem for me within moments.

Retard.

Poe's law is an Internet adage which states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extreme views will, to some readers, be indistinguishable from sincere expressions of the parodied views.[1][2][3]
Poe's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
I fell for it I guess, I still think it's real. I know people like this IRL.
The author "Jane M. Agni" has also written articles for National Report, which is also a news satire site.

Google the name, the top stuff coming up is blog posts and facebook posts debunking this "author" as a satirical author.

I googled her "book", claimed to have been on Oprah best seller titled "The States Of Shame: Living As A Liberated Womyn In America" and its bullshit as well.

Oh and it says as much in her bio, just noticed that

Jane M. Agni now writes full-time for National Report, giving her unique perspective on the latest world events.
Here's a National Report post by "her"

Christian Community In Uproar After Snopes Existence Of Jesus Christ | Jane M. Agni | National Report

And another

Study Claims Only Way To Be Less Racist Is To Accuse Others Of Racism | National Report
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Yes, Hodj, I understand what Poe's law is. The whole point is that the article in question is BLATANT and OBVIOUS "satire". It isin no way"indistinguishable from sincere expressions of the parodied views." ... Unless you're either a gullible moron or youwantto believe people are like that (so you can get on a high horse and judge them). The fact that people are so quick to believe bullshit like that (or, at the very least, have doubts) is not a reflection on SJWs, it's a sign of our apparently dwindling ability to analyze information critically. Every angry commenter under that article should be sterilized for the good of mankind.

It's like that whole "guess which college thought police poster is real" challenge all over again.

Edit: Mist, I expected better from you.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,764
52,350
The only gullible moron around here is the person who thinks that article wasn't indistinguishable from sincere expressions of the parodied views.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Clearly it is since at least two people in this very thread fell for it, you fucking moron.

The only gullible moron around here is the person who thinks that article wasn't indistinguishable from sincere expressions of the parodied views.
Two seconds quicker on the fire button Gavin.

+1 you

And Tanoomba, they aren't the only ones. This author has gotten a lot of people across the internet with their satire/trolling.

This is another of those cases where you live in a completely different universe from everyone else, because you are a fucking twit apologist hack.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
The only gullible moron around here is the person who thinks that article wasn't indistinguishable from sincere expressions of the parodied views.
Fucking really, dude? Again:

"My husband identifies as gender neutral, and whenever ?Xe? (my husbands current pronoun) witnesses our child playing with toy trucks and trains, it triggers ?Xer? so hard that ?Xe? crumbles into a quivering pile of inconsolable PTSD jitters."
This is so far from anything any real person would ever say under any circumstances that if you actually believe this is how SJWs talk (and behave), you should pull yourself out of the conversation completely because you're clearly too stupid to have any kind of perspective that will be worth a damn. Clearly, if you believe that could be "sincere" then you lack the reasoning skills required to offer any kind of valid insight into anything related to what real people believe. Holy fuck, it boggles the mind.

Also, look up the word "gullible". It doesn't mean: "the quality ofnotfalling for obvious bullshit".
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Guy just cannot help himself from trying to make excuses for his side.

Has to turn even this into a tone deaf defense of his precious.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Guy just cannot help himself from trying to make excuses for his side.

Has to turn even this into a tone deaf defense of his precious.
It's not "my side", you fucking ignorant moron. Do you have to respond to every single post I make with pointless drivel? Tone deaf, indeed.
 

Aamry

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,361
2,085
4. The Inner Texture
"It just felt like. Guts, on the inside, you know?" said Shauna White, an eager recipient of the latest vagina canal smoothing procedure. What that entails is scarring the vagina's inner walls with high powered cautery lasers. After multiple treatments the scar tissue inside gives a "slicker" more plastic-like feeling than what was originally a very textured and peculiar surface. "I have pretty much zero sensation down stairs. But it's not about my pleasure, is it? I just want my man to be happy. And It's definitely a plus that I'm not grossed out by my own body anymore" Shauna confessed.
lol
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Evans: Is Facebook making us gullible?


Here are a few choice quotes:

Incredibly, otherwise smart people pass bogus information along all the time, often with a hefty dose of smugness, indignation or alarm, mostly because it supports pre-conceived beliefs.

The first and most obvious cure for Facebook stupidity: Be skeptical.

The language alone is a tipoff that something isn't right

Thanks to such things as the repeal of the FCC's "fairness doctrine" in 1987 -- the rule required broadcasters to provide multiple views on issue of public interest -- and the rise of the Internet, we're increasingly locked into our own certainties.

That's not news to anyone who's been paying attention. But Facebook now amplifies the gullibility, self-righteousness and partisan differences that may one day drive us to destruction.


Clearly, this phenomenon isn't restricted to Facebook.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
12 months and 1250 plus pages of a thread of you defending them says different, dipshit.

And everyone here knows it.
Good. Keep going with your circular logic and giant ego. I look forward to the next time you'll spend 6 pages in the Amod thread bitching and whining about how unfair it is that a mod called you out on your terrible, terrible shitposting.

Have a good night.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
That's some grade A Moon Bat butthurt right there.

Citing your posts over an entire year in a thread where you've done nothing but relentlessly defend these people as proof you have done nothing but relentlessly defend these people isn't circular logic, by the way.
 

Agraza

Registered Hutt
6,890
521
Like all the independents who always vote republican that showed up as Bush Junior dropped in popularity.