Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...
- Thread starter Balthazar_sl
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Dude, I'm flattered that you're drawing attention to my past exploits, but at leastlink my quotes to the actual discussion!
I've got nothing to hide. The whole Zimmerman episode ended with me being presented with evidence that proved me wrong. I readily admitted to being wrong and never looked back. What, you think I should be ashamed? The Zimmerman trial is what proved I'm a bigger man than most here, in that I'm actually willing to admit when I'm wrong. It's my fucking ace in the hole.
Come at me, bro.
Court documents? You posted highly subjective interpretations of Facebook interactions, interactions which (given context) were absolutely nowhere near as incriminating as you are so eager to believe. All I did was show you that rape victims often DO continue to interact with the people who raped them in ways that would seem irrational to white guys who have never been raped. Are you suggesting that the blog posts and all the comments sharing similar experiences arefaked?Based on what? I've got people's experiences, you've got fuck all. Why are your feels stronger than what actual people have been through?
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Ah, I see you've decided to emulate the Fanaskin style of claiming I've said something that's not actually backed up by anything I've ever said.
Let me clarify: I'm ready and willing to admit I'm wrong about anything I'm proven wrong about. That's more than I can say for most here.
Chanur
Shit Posting Professional
- 28,577
- 45,698
So you didn't look at my link and are completely wrong then? Gotcha thanks for being man enough to admit it.
Abefroman
Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
- 12,594
- 11,937
Chanur
Shit Posting Professional
- 28,577
- 45,698
Ridas
Pay to play forum
- 2,879
- 4,143
You linked a fucking blog and some weird ass art comic. You showed us nothing and should go kill yourself.
Abefroman
Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
- 12,594
- 11,937
Soygen
The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
- 28,433
- 44,761
Tanoomba
So within a day she knew she was raped, but not only continued to communicate with the rapist, but was actively seeking out time with him to "cuddle" and hang out. Sounds legit. You also pruned out the part of my post where I asked you a question.
Phazael
Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
- 14,665
- 31,522
Yeah you guys pretty much zeroed in on the flaw in the "rape epidemic is real" canard. Your average rape fearing closeted puritan bigot SJW like Moon Bat or Mist do not understand the distinction between sexual harassment, sexual assault, and actual rape. They also do not grasp the entire concept of having to live with the consequences of a poor decision, which is why they believe "regret rape" is an actual thing. Everything is partisan and there is no nuance or context, just absolute polar arguments. ITs all driven by a combination of fear and this whole societal disease we have of never believing any of our problems are our own fault.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,943
- 138,378
No no you see all previous definitions are invalid, words are "evolving" infront of our eyes phazael.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Being raped isn't having your car broken into. Sulkowicz's annotations explain why she was asking to hang out, even as they both avoided actually hanging out. You've based your conclusion on your first impression that is most definitely NOT the only interpretation of the available information. You are actively blocking out all additional information that doesn't gel with with the righteous indignation you are clutching so dear to your heart. You're a useful idiot, letting polarizing ideology prevent you from using logic and reason... Very much like an SJW.
As for your question,Idon't define consent, the law does.
Congratulations, Phaz, for cramming the largest number of inaccuracies and straw men into a single, shit-filled paragraph. That's quite a talent.
- Rape-fearing? I'm the only one here who ISN'T terrified of the Feminazi brigade and their conspiracy to jail all men through false rape accusations. Again, I'm the moderate here.
- Closeted? If I were gay I would have no problem being open about it, especially on an anonymous message board.
- Puritan? I'm not religious, nor am I strict in moral matters.
- Bigot? I don't judge anybody by anything other than their words and actions. I can safely say you're an idiot, for example, since you have provided me with a bounty of evidence proving such.
- SJW? I see we're using the all-encompassing "anyone who has a perspective that differs from mine is an SJW" definitionAGAIN.*sigh*
- I have no problem making distinctions between sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape. Why do YOU have a problem admitting that sex without consent is rape?
- I absolutely understand the concept of having to live with the consequences of one's decisions and nothing I have ever said has indicated otherwise.
- I actually DON'T believe "regret rape" is an actual thing. The morons who keep using that term apparently do, though.
- I'm the only one who is actually treating this topic with any consideration of nuance and context at all, unlike everyone who mistakenly assumes they know how rape victims behave after being raped.
- I have made no polar arguments. Quite the opposite, I'm simply saying we DON'T KNOW what happened with Sulkowicz. It's everyone else who's being polarizing, both by pushing their flawed and unproven conclusions and by chastising anyone who dares disagree with their bullshit.
- Again, I'm LESS fearful than the peanut gallery. You're the ones terrified about society going to shit. I'm actually pretty optimistic.
- I believe all of the problems I have that are the consequences of my actions are my own fault, and that certainly applies to everyone else. I've never said anything to indicate otherwise.
- Closeted? If I were gay I would have no problem being open about it, especially on an anonymous message board.
- Puritan? I'm not religious, nor am I strict in moral matters.
- Bigot? I don't judge anybody by anything other than their words and actions. I can safely say you're an idiot, for example, since you have provided me with a bounty of evidence proving such.
- SJW? I see we're using the all-encompassing "anyone who has a perspective that differs from mine is an SJW" definitionAGAIN.*sigh*
- I have no problem making distinctions between sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape. Why do YOU have a problem admitting that sex without consent is rape?
- I absolutely understand the concept of having to live with the consequences of one's decisions and nothing I have ever said has indicated otherwise.
- I actually DON'T believe "regret rape" is an actual thing. The morons who keep using that term apparently do, though.
- I'm the only one who is actually treating this topic with any consideration of nuance and context at all, unlike everyone who mistakenly assumes they know how rape victims behave after being raped.
- I have made no polar arguments. Quite the opposite, I'm simply saying we DON'T KNOW what happened with Sulkowicz. It's everyone else who's being polarizing, both by pushing their flawed and unproven conclusions and by chastising anyone who dares disagree with their bullshit.
- Again, I'm LESS fearful than the peanut gallery. You're the ones terrified about society going to shit. I'm actually pretty optimistic.
- I believe all of the problems I have that are the consequences of my actions are my own fault, and that certainly applies to everyone else. I've never said anything to indicate otherwise.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Soygen
The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
- 28,433
- 44,761
khalid
Unelected Mod
- 14,071
- 6,775
Tanoomba takes at face value her obviously self-serving annotations on those facebook messages. They are obviously an attempt to explain (poorly) after the fact why she acted like an idiot, yet they still contradict or at least don't make sense in the facts that we do know. If she really believed she was raped immediately afterwards, then why did she wait so long to contact the police?
The only explanation that might make SOME sense for continued contact is if she didn't realize she was raped (it was a dodgy consent issue). If she did know she was raped, then no matter what she tries to say with her silly annotations that are about as believable as michael brown's friend's explanations for his robbing of the store, then the contact afterwards doesn't fit.
The only explanation that might make SOME sense for continued contact is if she didn't realize she was raped (it was a dodgy consent issue). If she did know she was raped, then no matter what she tries to say with her silly annotations that are about as believable as michael brown's friend's explanations for his robbing of the store, then the contact afterwards doesn't fit.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Oh, for fuck's s-
I DON'T KNOW. NEITHER DO YOU.
It's entirely feasible she was, and it's certainly feasible she wasn't. I've already agreed that the way the school handled it was terrible. The only reason this became an argument is because Chanur's conclusion that she's lying because she "wasn't acting like a rape victim" is fucking stupid.
Christ, you're an imbecile.
Oh wait, did you know the word"imbecile"comes from the 1540s French word "imbecile", meaning "weak, feeble" (especially in reference to the body)? Guess that makes you a nu-imbecile.