Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,022
79,781
I'm perfectly average. You wouldn't look twice at me walking down the street or biking past your house.

All part of the plan.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
Which every race gender had to go through. Like the average male serf in feudal times.
Society didn't *have* to go through feudal times. It was a period of regression and low economic activity. It was basically the west's 1000 year depression.

Feudalism happened because of bad attitudes and low expectations from the top of society to the bottom. There was nothing preventing people from coming out of the dark ages besides people themselves.

If you don't want to experience those times again, fighting for progress, fighting for rising expectations is a must.

That's why all this social science bullshit, which seems on the surface to be meaningless for the survival of the species, is actually vitally important. Most of society's problems are human problems that need to be overcome, not scientific ones.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
26,236
39,960
That's why all this social science bullshit, which seems on the surface to be meaningless for the survival of the species, is actually vitally important. Most of society's problems are human problems that need to be overcome, not scientific ones.
Yeah like todays war on boys and men.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
I wish every post on this thread had a real-life picture of each person as their avatar. I bet this thread would be at least three to four times funnier that way.
I've been often compared to Leonardo DiCaprio or Orlando Bloom looks wise, so if you want, I can put either of them as my avatar.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
Which every race gender had to go through. Like the average male serf in feudal times.
No one is denying that at some point in human history, every race or gender has suffered, but you framing the invention of labor saving devices as a favor to women (women who had no choice but to do them because of their total lack of legal status) is the kind of pants-on-the-head-retarded nonsense that normal people laugh at and feminists feast on as red meat.

Its like the perfect thing to say as a white, out-of-touch octogenarian who has no idea that the world has changed around him, like Donald Sterling. "Why aren't women happy?? They got dishwashers now! Back in my day we had to go down to the creek to do dishes!"
 

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,433
44,761
I've been often compared to Leonardo DiCaprio or Orlando Bloom looks wise, so if you want, I can put either of them as my avatar.
You have to post a picture when you still had your Journey hair.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
This lesbian is outsmarting mkopec pretty well. Clearly she is using the male part of her brain, the part that makes her lust for vagina.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
26,236
39,960
My argument is this....Feminists once had noble goals of securing voting rights, achieving educational parity, and opening employment channels for women. But once these goals were met and even exceeded, the activists did not want to lose relevance. Now, they tirelessly and ruthlessly lobby for changes in legislation that are blatantly discriminatory against men (not to mention unconstitutional and downright cruel). Not satisfied with that, they continue to lobby for social programs designed to devalue the roles of husbands and fathers, replacing them with taxpayer-funded handouts.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
My argument is this....Feminists once had noble goals of securing voting rights, achieving educational parity, and opening employment channels for women. But once these goals were met and even exceeded, the activists did not want to lose relevance. Now, they tirelessly and ruthlessly lobby for changes in legislation that are blatantly discriminatory against men (not to mention unconstitutional and downright cruel). Not satisfied with that, they continue to lobby for social programs designed to devalue the roles of husbands and fathers, replacing them with taxpayer-funded handouts.
Was all the way with you until the end where you inevitably and uncontrollably descended into typical GOP herp derp about government programs.
 

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,433
44,761
My argument is this....Feminists once had noble goals of securing voting rights, achieving educational parity, and opening employment channels for women. But once these goals were met and even exceeded, the activists did not want to lose relevance. Now, they tirelessly and ruthlessly lobby for changes in legislation that are blatantly discriminatory against men (not to mention unconstitutional and downright cruel). Not satisfied with that, they continue to lobby for social programs designed to devalue the roles of husbands and fathers, replacing them with taxpayer-funded handouts.
What are some of the more ruthless tactics they have used to lobby and what are the more egregious pieces of anti-man legislation they have successfully implemented?

I'm not being sarcastic, but honestly asking.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
As much as I hate the concept of rape culture, you're actually making the caseforrape culture, by the way. If you, personally, are going to take all the credit for all the good things men did, then you, personally have to take all the credit for all the bad things men did.

You're just as responsible for inventing the clothes dryer as you are for Elliot Rodger.
rrr_img_68271.gif


Thank you for wording it like I intended it to sound like. Im not a good writer.
Most stupid people aren't.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
I would like a feminist to describe to me what they see as the end game of feminism and what point society has to reach for feminism to become eventually irrelevant?
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
I would like a feminist to describe to me what they see as the end game of feminism and what point society has to reach for feminism to become eventually irrelevant?
I imagine its just like our current society but all positions of power have women in them so basically feminism isn't a movement for equality, its a movement for dominance.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
I imagine its just like our current society but all positions of power have women in them so basically feminism isn't a movement for equality, its a movement for dominance.
If that were true, that would make women and men more similar than we thought. Just two groups vying for dominance: one fighting to keep it , the other fighting to take it away. Of course, in much the same way the story of Bioshock Infinite didn't work, it doesn't quite seem fair to criticize a group for wanting to dominate when they've been the ones being dominated up to this point. That'sifyour statement were true, which it isn't.

Which is the only group guaranteed to dominate? The rich.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,150
160,366
Describe to me your perfect feminist society, tardnoomba
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
I would like a feminist to describe to me what they see as the end game of feminism and what point society has to reach for feminism to become eventually irrelevant?
This is ridiculous. This is like asking for the endgame of workers rights, or the endgame of scientific understanding of the world. There is no endgame, progress marches on.

But a good start, at least for the US, would be roughly equal representation in the House and Senate. The judiciary is finally starting to get there. Once we've got that, I think the rest will take care of itself over the long haul.