Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
Yeah, I dont understand what more women is supposed to accomplish. An end to the mythical "patriarchy"?

There's plenty who are just fine with the status quo, like Palin.
That's what I'm saying. We're on the same side and you're too dumb to realize it.

As long as a tiny handful of people get to pick who gets to run, you're frequently going to be stuck with options like Palin, who are literally worse than any man or woman off the street.

I've long since advocated that the House should be switched to an opt-in lottery of high-school or equivalent educated people who can pass a basic civics test.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
This statement right here -



is that there just needs to be more women and then something something democracy.

You want more women because reasons and I want to reinstate Glass Steagall.
To your point about women voting for women, women shouldn't vote for women just because they're women.

You're RIGHT, that WOULD be terribly sexist.

They should vote for women that women actually want to vote for, that support policies that women actually want.

But since men largely control the process of who gets to run, the women that get to run are largely women that women don't want to vote for. See: Sarah fucking Palin.
You completely missed this post apparently.
 

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,025
79,788
All I know is that there's a strong correlation with how fucked up our democracy is, and how few women are involved in leading it.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,152
160,366
That's what I'm saying. We're on the same side and you're too dumb to realize it.

As long as a tiny handful of people get to pick who gets to run, you're frequently going to be stuck with options like Palin, who are literally worse than any man or woman off the street.

I've long since advocated that the House should be switched to an opt-in lottery of high-school or equivalent educated people who can pass a basic civics test.
We're on the same side, but you're dumb to figure out that we are debating different things. I'm not the only one who tried to explain it to you, at least half a dozen people tried as well. So you think the problem is with all of us and not your lack of comprehension?

edef6422939bb1e74049a9ab762d99a2a2ce2347e733cfc67e0b722df954bf82.jpg
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,152
160,366
All I know is that there's a strong correlation with how fucked up our democracy is, and how few women are involved in leading it.
This seemingly implies that having more women would fix our democracy. Can't wait to see the thought process on that gem.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
We're on the same side, but you're dumb to figure out that we are debating different things. I'm not the only one who tried to explain it to you, at least half a dozen people tried as well. So you think the problem is with all of us and not your lack of comprehension?

edef6422939bb1e74049a9ab762d99a2a2ce2347e733cfc67e0b722df954bf82.jpg
I did not say that women would be better at leading anything.

What I'm saying is that the same SYMPTOM that causes there to be less women in elected office is the same SYMPTOM that causes our entire democracy to be fucked up. I'm not saying that one caused the other.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
Women deserve the same right to be bought off by lobbyists as men have.
This was my original point. The way the system works right now, the only people you get to vote for is a bunch of whores, whether they be male whores or female whores. Who the fuck wants to vote for whores?
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,152
160,366
I did not say that women would be better at leading anything.

What I'm saying is that the same SYMPTOM that causes there to be less women in elected office is the same SYMPTOM that causes our entire democracy to be fucked up. I'm not saying that one caused the other.
And what I'm saying AGAIN, along with others, is that there is zero evidence for your assertion.

It's just an assertion, unsupported by a single fact but repeated ad nauseam by you.



Have you provided a single piece of evidence to support that assertion?

How long are we going to be repeating this?
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,152
160,366
This was my original point. The way the system works right now, the only people you get to vote for is a bunch of whores, whether they be male whores or female whores. Who the fuck wants to vote for whores?
And that still has nothing to do with female under representation in US politics. **yawn**
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
And that still has nothing to do with female under representation in US politics. **yawn**
I'm still trying to figure out what I'm supposed to be arguing.

Do I really need to provide some kind of chart or graph that says that rich white men are more likely to financially back other white men, white men in drag like Thatcher, or just plain money loving whores? It's pretty fucking obvious.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,152
160,366
Nah, you need to explain that if rich old white guys are trying to keep women down, why is that less women vote for women than men, or why rich old white guys even back women in politics.

While our system no doubt sucks, it makes no distinction between genders. Blaming the lack of political representation on a poor system is akin to blaming a lack of tigers on the presence of a tiger rock.

Get it together.
 

Sebudai

Ssraeszha Raider
12,022
22,504
I'm still trying to figure out what I'm supposed to be arguing.

Do I really need to provide some kind of chart or graph that says that rich white men are more likely to financially back other white men, white men in drag like Thatcher, or just plain money loving whores? It's pretty fucking obvious.
Do you need to support your claims with evidence if you want them to be taken seriously? Uh, yes?
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
Nah, you need to explain that if rich old white guys are trying to keep women down, why is that less women vote for women than men, or why rich old white guys even back women in politics.

While our system no doubt sucks, it makes no distinction between genders. Blaming the lack of political representation on a poor system is akin to blaming a lack of tigers on the presence of a tiger rock.

Get it together.
I DID EXPLAIN THIS. The women who make it through the process required to get the money to run are the kinds of women that women don't want to vote for, because they come out of the process sounding like men in drag or just blatant whores.

You're acting like the general election is the part of the process that matters. It doesn't. That's why I linked the fucking Lesterland video.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,397
Do you need to support your claims with evidence if you want them to be taken seriously? Uh, yes?
Obvious shit is obvious. This sounds like those people who need a scientific study to tell whether drinking makes you worse at driving.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,152
160,366
I DID EXPLAIN THIS. The women who make it through the process required to get the money to run are the kinds of women that women don't want to vote for, because they come out of the process sounding like men in drag or just blatant whores.

You're acting like the general election is the part of the process that matters. It doesn't. That's why I linked the fucking Lesterland video.
So they vote for men instead who are the other whores?

Doesn't even make sense
 

Sebudai

Ssraeszha Raider
12,022
22,504
Obvious shit is obvious. This sounds like those people who need a scientific study to tell whether drinking makes you worse at driving.
And we've come full circle. This is what passes for logic and reason on the left nowadays. Make assertions, fail to substantiate them in any serious way, claim they're "obvious", and repeat them over and over until they're considered facts.