Ya my internets have taken the initial hit but you would think with 20,000 views, and probably what 10,000 of those new people since the Megans law thing that I would have more then just 20 people giving me negs lol ....
Apparently a lot of viewers arn"t FoH members or my viewpoints don"t piss off more then 20 people enough to neg me.
By the way... this thread has a direct link from his website!
Like I said I don"t care the purpose of the ML website is to inform people and I really have nothing to be ashamed of, considering 3 Justices of the United States Supreme Court agree with me, as to the Countries of France, Spain and Chaina.
There is nothing crazy or extreme about my postitions.
No one has commented on a law that prohibits people as stupid as you from having sex, why not?
Now that pregnancy prevention and STD (by the way STD wasn"t a real big concern in 1984 prior to Aids) have been given up as an argument your argument reduces to:
You took advantage of someone stupid.
Well generally the way we determine if someone is stupid or not is intelligent tests. Some individuals over the age of 18 are stupid and some individuals under the age of 18 are smart.
100percent of those who score low on intelligent tests are stupid and 100percent of those who score high are smart.
Why use age as a determination if someone is stupid to consent to sex; better to use intelligence to dertemine if someone is to stupid to consent to sex.
To be a doctor you have to pass a test; you dont become a doctor at some age. DRive; a test. Lawyer; a test. Contractor; a test. Age is really very poor indicator of skills/knowledge of a particular field. Thats why a 12 year old can beat you in WoW because they have spend more hours playing the game then you have.
Now from the standpoint of society wouldn"t it be better that only those with high IQ"s (like me) be allowed, by law, to procreate, and those with lower IQ"s (like you) be prohibite by law from engaging in sex except with someone with a high IQ. Thats way the offspring would at least have a 50/50 chance to be intelligent.
I mean think about it; do we really want stupid people to have sex and reproduce?
Thus a law which allows those with IQ"s in the 99th percential to have sex with anyone and those who don"t have such IQ"s to only be allowed to have sex with those who do (i.e. if you are not as smart as me you can only have sex with those who are as smart as me). Such a law of course would be enforced at gunpoint.
Your whole argument against me at this point is that I took advantage of someone to young to be smart or who was stupid. Well then why should you be able to have sex with someone who compared to me is also stupid? Are you not also taking advantage of your stupid sexual partner?
Would anyone have any problem with a law that insures all our childern have at least one intelligent parent?
