Dr. Mario's Retard Rehabilitation Program

Status
Not open for further replies.

Itzena_sl

shitlord
4,609
6
What was the issue with him? I just remember he used to post anime. I recall first watching berserk anime off of what ever he was using to post it. Then there was allot of conflict around him may have been a bit of a edgelord problem but I really don't recall very much of it,
He didn't like Utena therefore his opinion of anime was wrong.

I always liked James but he was a dick at the end.
TOG was always a dick, it was just most of the time he was the sort of dick people liked.


Ah, metaphorically speaking of course.
 

Skanda

I'm Amod too!
6,662
4,506
Looks like he stuck his head up in Tarrent's fiefdom. Probably triggered the shit out of him.
 

Izo

Tranny Chaser
19,375
23,256
You have received an infraction at Rerolled
Dear Izo,

You have received an infraction at Rerolled.

Reason: 7 Day RRP
-------
Take a break.
-------

This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.rerolled.org/showthread.php?p=1292880
Are you home schooling your five kids, dork?
All the best,
Rerolled
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Nice Izo, great discussion you got going in that thread. Maybe it will open up LirkingDirk and others a bit to how he is indoctrinating his kids to his own faith, rather than raising them with an open mind.
 

Izo

Tranny Chaser
19,375
23,256
Hey dork, how's the article reading going?
Here it is, in case you forgot: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/06/study-religious-kids-are-jerks.html
 

lurkingdirk

AssHat Taint
<Medals Crew>
46,164
211,350
Hey dork, how's the article reading going?
Here it is, in case you forgot: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/06/study-religious-kids-are-jerks.html
I read it the first time you posted it. It's not a well written article, to be sure, but the little content it does have is troubling to me. I find the whole premise of the article ridiculous for two reasons:
1. Making general statements like "all religious kids are jerks" is not productive. Even "most religious kids are jerks" is not productive. Are there kids who are jerks who come from religious families? Yes. Many of them. Are there religious people who are jerks? Yes. Many of them. But blanket statements of that sort are useless. Most women are bitches. Most men are bumbling idiots. I could find studies to support those statements.
2. We're talking about kids. All kids can be jerks. Do the same test with the same kids five days in a row, get five different results.

Not a convincing article, but not because it says something about religious kids, because it's just not a convincing article.

I heard Alvin Platinga wants to suck Lewis' cock.

No homo though.
Actually, not Plantinga, I hear George Marsden is actually working on something quasi biological on Lewis now. Plantinga has some beefs with Lewis.
 

Izo

Tranny Chaser
19,375
23,256
I read it the first time you posted it. It's not a well written article, to be sure, but the little content it does have is troubling to me. I find the whole premise of the article ridiculous for two reasons:
1. Making general statements like "all religious kids are jerks" is not productive. Even "most religious kids are jerks" is not productive. Are there kids who are jerks who come from religious families? Yes. Many of them. Are there religious people who are jerks? Yes. Many of them. But blanket statements of that sort are useless. Most women are bitches. Most men are bumbling idiots. I could find studies to support those statements.
2. We're talking about kids. All kids can be jerks. Do the same test with the same kids five days in a row, get five different results.

Not a convincing article, but not because it says something about religious kids, because it's just not a convincing article.



Actually, not Plantinga, I hear George Marsden is actually working on something quasi biological on Lewis now. Plantinga has some beefs with Lewis.
Cool
smile.png

Did you go to the actual study after reading the journalists article? Here is the actual study:
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)01167-7
I don't know if you are familiar with reading scientific publications, understand statistical analysis and such - hence why I posted the easy to read and understand article. How do you find hard science convincing?

There are several findings (see results), and the discussion area has the point summed up like this:
Overall, our findings cast light on the cultural input of religion on prosocial behavior and contradict the common-sense and popular assumption that children from religious households are more altruistic and kind toward others. More generally, they call into question whether religion is vital for moral development, supporting the idea that the secularization of moral discourse will not reduce human kindness
What do you think about this?
 

lurkingdirk

AssHat Taint
<Medals Crew>
46,164
211,350
I think two things (again)
1. That's science done from a particular perspective, which will likely find the result it wants. I'm very familiar with reading scientific articles, thanks.
2. You're trying hard to trigger me. You won't.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
When science says something religion likes: That's science done correctly
When science says something religion dislikes (the vast majority of scientific research): That's science done from a skewed perspective!

Its really not dude. They took a broad sample size including a diverse sample set of various religions and tested to see how children reacted under certain circumstances, and they found that the religious children by and large were much more selfish in the process.

There was no "particular perspective" there. That's just a dysphemistic fallacy attempting to hand wave away the cognitive dissonance of seeing how religion actually harms the capacity of children to work cooperatively with others.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Really, your rebuttal is just a toned down version of Ken Ham's "Were you there?" "Scientists conduct science with a bias against God" type hand washing.

The scientific process is about reducing bias, not operating from it. You're confusing religion with science.
 

Izo

Tranny Chaser
19,375
23,256
Okay, so science doesn't impress you much.

Could you get back to the schooling of your children then? I asked if you home schooled. You said no -> public school and then 7th grade onto an unnamed supposedly top school. I asked by what standard it was a top school, and also if it was a religiously founded - and also why 7th grade. Could you elaborate on this?

In contrast we do public/private schools 0-9th, then high school/trade school, then prof. bachelors or university).
 

chthonic-anemos

bitchute.com/video/EvyOjOORbg5l/
8,606
27,289
I haven't kept up but it's indoctrination. No matter how nice and open you are, other cult members intentionally wield social pressure.
 

Kriptini

Vyemm Raider
3,675
3,572
I was raised religious (went to public school though, not private/home school) and I wasn't a jerk. I tried to always treat people with respect. "What would Jesus do," etc. All my friends in middle school especially were also all raised religious and not jerks. We mostly just kept to ourselves while everyone else set each other on fire. (Middle school is a terrible place.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.